share_log

Individual Investors Account for 38% of New China Life Insurance Company Ltd.'s (SHSE:601336) Ownership, While Sovereign Wealth Funds Account for 31%

Individual Investors Account for 38% of New China Life Insurance Company Ltd.'s (SHSE:601336) Ownership, While Sovereign Wealth Funds Account for 31%

個人投資者佔新華保險(SHSE:601336)所有權的38%,而主權財富基金佔31%
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 03:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • New China Life Insurance's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Institutions own 16% of New China Life Insurance
  • 新華保險的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受來自更大公衆的股東影響。
  • 前5大股東持有50%的業務。
  • 機構擁有新華保險16%的股份。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of New China Life Insurance Company Ltd. (SHSE:601336), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解真正掌控新華保險有哪些人,理解該企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司38%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體會獲益最多(或在低迷時期損失最多)。

Meanwhile, sovereign wealth funds make up 31% of the company's shareholders.

同時,主權財富基金佔公司股東的31%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of New China Life Insurance.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了新華保險的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601336 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SHSE:601336所有權分佈圖2024年6月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About New China Life Insurance?

機構投資者對新華保險有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in New China Life Insurance. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see New China Life Insurance's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在新華保險中佔有相當的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過度依賴機構投資者的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總是有一個'擁擠的交易'風險。如果這樣的交易失誤,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。如果公司沒有成長曆史,則這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到新華保險的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601336 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
SHSE:601336收益和營業收入增長圖2024年6月17日

New China Life Insurance is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Central Huijin Investment Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 31% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 3.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, China Baowu Steel Group Co.,Ltd and China Securities Finance Corp, Asset Management Arm are the second and third largest shareholders.

新華保險不是由對沖基金擁有的。我們的數據顯示,中央匯金投資有限責任公司是最大的股東,持有31%的流通股。而中國寶武鋼鐵集團有限公司和中國證券金融股份有限公司資產管理部分別持有12%和3.0%的流通股,是該公司的第二和第三大股東。

On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察後,我們發現前5大股東佔有該公司50%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對公司的決策具有重要的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of New China Life Insurance

新華保險的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over New China Life Insurance. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

個人投資者擁有該公司38%的所有權,他們往往是普通大衆。雖然這種佔有率可能不足以促使政策決定向他們更有利的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策進行集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the New China Life Insurance stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起來,私人公司佔新華保險股票的14%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過對私營公司的持股而對公衆公司產生興趣,而不是以個人的身份持有。雖然很難做出任何一般性結論,但值得注意的是這一領域的進一步研究。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for New China Life Insurance that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更加重要的因素。例如,在投資新華保險之前,我們發現了2個警告信號,您應該意識到這些因素。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論