share_log

Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Crescent Energy(紐交所: CRGY)的債務使用可能被視爲風險。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 07:44

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Crescent Energy Company (NYSE:CRGY) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,“波動性與風險是迥然不同的概念。” 因此,當你考慮任何一隻股票的風險時,需要考慮到負債的問題,因爲太多的負債可能會使公司陷入困境。我們可以看到,Crescent Energy Company(NYSE:CRGY)在業務中確實使用了債務。但是這個債務是否會讓股東感到擔憂呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

當企業不能輕鬆地用自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金時,債務和其他負債對企業變得具有風險。資本主義的一部分是“創造性破壞”過程,銀行家無情地清算了失敗的企業。然而,更頻繁(但仍具有成本)的情況是,企業必須以損失慘重的價格發行股票,從而永久稀釋股東的利益以支持其資產負債表。債務取代股權稀釋後,債務可以成爲爲需要以高收益率投資創增長的企業提供資本的極好工具。當我們思考公司使用債務時,我們首先考慮現金和債務。

What Is Crescent Energy's Debt?

Crescent Energy的債務問題是什麼?

As you can see below, at the end of March 2024, Crescent Energy had US$1.75b of debt, up from US$1.24b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

正如你在下圖中所看到的,截至2024年3月底,Crescent Energy擁有17.5億美元的債務,比一年前的12.4億美元增加了0.31億美元。點擊圖片查看詳細信息。然而,公司現金並不多,因此其淨債務與上年基本相同。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:CRGY Debt to Equity History June 17th 2024
NYSE:CRGY債務/股權歷史記錄 2024年6月17日

A Look At Crescent Energy's Liabilities

根據最近披露的資產負債表顯示,Crescent Energy在12個月內有7.481億美元的負債以及超過12個月的25.1億美元負債。與此相應的是,公司在12個月內擁有532萬美元現金和4.697億美元應收賬款。因此,公司的負債總額比公司現金和短期應收賬款的總和多27.8億美元。鑑於這個赤字實際上高於公司市值的21.1億美元,我們認爲股東應該像親子看護孩子第一次騎自行車一樣關注Crescent Energy的債務水平。如果公司不得不快速清理其資產負債表,那麼似乎有可能導致股東遭受嚴重稀釋。

According to the last reported balance sheet, Crescent Energy had liabilities of US$748.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.51b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$5.32m in cash and US$469.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$2.78b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

儘管Crescent Energy的債務僅爲1.6,但其利息覆蓋率非常低,僅爲1.4。很大程度上是由於它有很多折舊和攤銷費用。這些費用可能是非現金的,因此在還債時可以排除它們。但會計費用也有其存在的意義-有些資產正在貶值。在任何情況下,可以肯定的是,公司有着有意義的債務。股東應該知道Crescent Energy的息稅前利潤(EBIT)去年下降了84%。如果這種賺錢的趨勢繼續下去,那麼償還債務將會像將貓放到過山車上一樣困難。毫無疑問,資產負債表是了解債務狀況的最好方法。然而,與債務相關的投資風險遠不止限於資產負債表。請注意Crescent Energy在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個預警信號,其中2個有問題...

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$2.11b, we think shareholders really should watch Crescent Energy's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

雖然Crescent Energy的債務僅爲1.6,但其利息覆蓋率真的非常低,僅爲1.4。這很大程度上是因爲它有很多折舊和攤銷費用。這些費用可能是非現金的,因此在還債時可以排除它們。但會計費用也有其存在的意義-有些資產正在貶值。在任何情況下,可以肯定的是,公司有着有意義的債務。股東應該知道Crescent Energy的息稅前利潤(EBIT)去年下降了84%。如果這種賺錢的趨勢繼續下去,那麼償還債務將會像將貓放到過山車上一樣困難。鑑於這個赤字實際上高於公司市值的21.1億美元,我們認爲股東應該像親子看護孩子第一次騎自行車一樣關注Crescent Energy的債務水平。如果公司不得不快速清理其資產負債表,那麼似乎有可能導致股東遭受嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

Even though Crescent Energy's debt is only 1.6, its interest cover is really very low at 1.4. In large part that's it has so much depreciation and amortisation. These charges may be non-cash, so they could be excluded when it comes to paying down debt. But the accounting charges are there for a reason -- some assets are seen to be losing value. In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. Shareholders should be aware that Crescent Energy's EBIT was down 84% last year. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Crescent Energy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

儘管Crescent Energy的債務僅爲1.6,但其利息覆蓋率爲1.4,非常低。這在很大程度上是因爲其折舊和攤銷非常多。這些費用可能不是現金費用,因此在償還債務時可以將其排除在外。但是,會計費用出現的原因是某些資產被視爲正在貶值。無論如何,公司的負債是實質性的。股東應該注意到,Crescent Energy的EBIT去年下降了84%。如果這種收益趨勢持續下去,償還債務將像讓貓乘過山車一樣困難。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務最多。但是未來的收入,而不是其他任何東西,將決定Crescent Energy未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您關注未來,請查看這份免費報告,其中包含分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Considering the last two years, Crescent Energy actually recorded a cash outflow, overall. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.

任何企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤是不能滿足的。因此,如果你關注未來,就值得檢查Crescent Energy誰能確定現金流量是否可靠。據考慮過去兩年的情況,Crescent Energy實際上記錄了整體現金流出。債務通常在負自由現金流的企業手中更昂貴,也幾乎總是更具風險性。股東應該希望企業能夠有所改善。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both Crescent Energy's interest cover and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. Having said that, its ability handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, isn't such a worry. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Crescent Energy has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Crescent Energy is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are concerning...

坦率地說,既Crescent Energy的利息覆蓋率又其EBIT增長記錄(不增長)使我們對其債務水平感到不安。話雖如此,基於其EBITDA的負債處理能力並不令人擔憂。經過考慮所討論的數據點,我們認爲Crescent Energy的債務過多。這種風險對某些人來說沒問題,但它肯定無法引起我們的興趣。很明顯,資產負債表是您分析債務時應關注的領域。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。請注意,Crescent Energy在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警示信號,其中有2個令人擔憂......

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論