share_log

Chief Scientific Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IBRX) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 4.5% After Recent Drop

Chief Scientific Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IBRX) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 4.5% After Recent Drop

最大股東、免疫生物公司(NASDAQ: IBRX)首席科學官Patrick Soon-Shiong在最近的股價下跌後,其持股的價值下降了4.5%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 08:11

Key Insights

主要見解

  • ImmunityBio's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in ImmunityBio is 10%
  • ImmunityBio的大量內部股權表明公司擴張具有內在的利益。
  • 前兩大股東持有該公司62%的股份。
  • 機構在ImmunityBio中的持有比例爲10%。

A look at the shareholders of ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個組織最具有影響力。我們可以看到,個人內部股東持有公司43%的股權。換句話說,該組織面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$194m.

因此,由於市值下降了1.94億美元,內部人員作爲一個組織遭受了最高的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ImmunityBio.

讓我們更加深入地了解股東的不同類型,看看它們對ImmunityBio有什麼啓示。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:IBRX Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
NasdaqGS:IBRX所有權分解 2024年6月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ImmunityBio?

機構投資者對ImmunityBio有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者之間有一定的可信度。但是,我們不能僅憑這個事實來依賴機構的投資,因爲機構有時會做壞投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,存在股票過度交易的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下面看到ImmunityBio的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ImmunityBio. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ImmunityBio's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

NasdaqGS:IBRX收入和營收增長2024年6月17日。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:IBRX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
ImmunityBio未被對沖基金持有。因爲行動比言語更有說服力,所以當內部人員在一家公司中擁有大量股份時,我們認爲這是一個好的跡象。在ImmunityBio的情況下,其首席科學官Patrick Soon-Shiong是最大的股東,持有公司42%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有20%和14%的流通股份。

ImmunityBio is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In ImmunityBio's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Patrick Soon-Shiong, is the largest shareholder, holding 42% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 20% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

最新的數據表明,內部人員擁有ImmunityBio, Inc.的合理比例。可以看到,內部人員在這家41億美元的公司中持有有意義的18億美元的股份。大多數人會認爲,尤其是在這樣一個公司中,這顯示了與股東的良好協調。您可以單擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of ImmunityBio

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有ImmunityBio的13%股份。儘管擁有這樣的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這種所有權可能不足以改變公司的政策。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ImmunityBio, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.8b stake in this US$4.1b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

在所有者的身份方面,我們的最新數據表明,內部人員擁有ImmunityBio, Inc.的合理比例。看到內部人員在這家價值41億美元的公司中持有有意義的18億美元的股份非常有趣。在這個公司中,股東們是基本上相同的。其中有些人做了更好的工作,賺了錢,但有些人輸了,必須面對低迴報。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in ImmunityBio. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

與公司的政策相關的所有權可能不足以改變決策的方向。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 20%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司佔20%的所有權,將在塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時是行動派,對管理層負責。但是,有時,私募股權只是在公司公開上市後出售。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據表明,私有公司持有該公司14%的股份。單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得研究誰擁有這些私有公司。有時候,內部人員或其他相關方可以通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - ImmunityBio has 6 warning signs (and 5 which are potentially serious) we think you should know about.

我非常有興趣看公司具體的所有者是誰。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - ImmunityBio有6個警示信號(5個可能嚴重)我們認爲您應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論