share_log

RPC (NYSE:RES) Shareholders Have Lost 15% Over 1 Year, Earnings Decline Likely the Culprit

RPC (NYSE:RES) Shareholders Have Lost 15% Over 1 Year, Earnings Decline Likely the Culprit

RPC(紐交所:RES)的股東在1年內虧損了15%,盈利下降很可能是罪魁禍首。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 08:41

It's easy to match the overall market return by buying an index fund. While individual stocks can be big winners, plenty more fail to generate satisfactory returns. Unfortunately the RPC, Inc. (NYSE:RES) share price slid 17% over twelve months. That's well below the market return of 23%. Longer term investors have fared much better, since the share price is up 6.7% in three years. It's down 21% in about a quarter.

通過購買指數基金很容易達到全市場回報。雖然個別股票可能大賺,但更多的股票未能取得令人滿意的回報。不幸的是,RPC公司(NYSE:RES)股價在過去的十二個月中下跌了17%。這遠低於市場回報的23%。而長期投資者表現得更好,因爲股價在三年內上漲了6.7%。在大約一個季度的時間裏下跌了21%。

If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for RPC isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.

如果過去一週是任何事情的指示,RPC的投資者情緒並不樂觀,因此讓我們看看基本面和股價之間是否存在不匹配。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

雖然一些人仍然相信有效市場假說,但已經證明市場是過度反應的動態系統,投資者並不總是理性的。一個不完美但簡單的方法來考慮公司市場看法的變化是比較每股收益(EPS)的變化和股價的波動。

Unfortunately RPC reported an EPS drop of 45% for the last year. The share price fall of 17% isn't as bad as the reduction in earnings per share. So despite the weak per-share profits, some investors are probably relieved the situation wasn't more difficult.

不幸的是,RPC上一年的每股收益下降了45%。儘管每股收益利潤較弱,但一些投資者可能鬆了一口氣,因爲情況沒有更加困難。與每股收益的降低相比,股價下跌了17%並不算太糟糕。

The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下圖顯示了EPS隨時間的變化情況(如果您單擊該圖像,則可以查看更多詳細信息)。

earnings-per-share-growth
NYSE:RES Earnings Per Share Growth June 17th 2024
NYSE:RES每股收益增長2024年6月17日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..

很高興地報告,該公司的CEO獲得的報酬比同等資本化公司的大多數CEO要適度。關注CEO的薪酬值得一提,但更重要的問題是公司是否將在今後的歲月中不斷增長收益。在買賣股票之前,我們總是建議仔細研究歷史增長趨勢,在此處提供。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

While the broader market gained around 23% in the last year, RPC shareholders lost 15% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 2% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand RPC better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for RPC you should be aware of.

儘管整個市場在過去一年中上漲了約23%,RPC股東們卻損失了15%(甚至包括股息)。 但是,要記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月的時間內表現不佳。 不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明存在未解決的挑戰,因爲它比過去半個世紀的年化損失2%還要糟糕。 我們意識到,芭倫·羅茨柴爾德曾經說過,投資者應在“血腥”的街道上購買股票,但我們警告投資者首先要確定他們正在購買高質量的業務。 跟蹤股價長期表現總是很有趣的。 但是爲了更好地了解RPC,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們已經發現RPC有2個警告信號,您應該注意。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果您願意查看另一家公司(具有潛在的更好財務狀況),請不要錯過這個免費的公司列表,證明它們可以增長收益。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論