share_log

While Private Companies Own 27% of China Aerospace Times Electronics CO., LTD. (SHSE:600879), Individual Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 53% Ownership

While Private Companies Own 27% of China Aerospace Times Electronics CO., LTD. (SHSE:600879), Individual Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 53% Ownership

儘管私人公司擁有中國航天電子股份有限公司(SHSE:600879)27%的股份,但個人投資者是其最大的股東,擁有53%的所有權。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 18:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over China Aerospace Times Electronics by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • 20% of China Aerospace Times Electronics is held by Institutions
  • 個人投資者對中國航天時代電子的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
  • 前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 46%。
  • 中國航天時代電子的 20% 股份由機構持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of China Aerospace Times Electronics CO., LTD. (SHSE:600879), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解中國航天時代電子股份有限公司(SHSE:600879)實際控制權的歸屬,了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司 53% 的所有權。換句話說,該集團最有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的利潤(或者承擔最大的風險)。

Meanwhile, private companies make up 27% of the company's shareholders.

私營企業佔該公司股東的 27%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Aerospace Times Electronics.

讓我們仔細研究一下不同類型的股東對中國航天時代電子的影響。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600879 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SHSE:600879 所有權拆分表 2024 年 6 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Aerospace Times Electronics?

機構所有權能告訴我們有關中國航天時代電子的哪些信息呢?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Aerospace Times Electronics. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of China Aerospace Times Electronics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在中國航天時代電子方面擁有相當數量的股份。這表明公司在投資中具有一定的信譽度。然而,仍應警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證,因爲他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,往往會導致股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查中國航天時代電子的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600879 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
我們注意到,對於中國航天時代電子,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是中國航天科技集團公司,佔流通股的 24%。同時,第二、第三大股東分別持有流通股的 4.3% 和 2.5%。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Aerospace Times Electronics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation with 24% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.3% and 2.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有中國航天時代電子 53% 的所有權。通過這種所有權,零售投資者可以共同發揮作用,影響影響股東回報的決策,如紅利政策和董事任命。他們也可以行使投票權,對不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of China Aerospace Times Electronics

中國航天時代電子的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們注意到我們的數據不顯示任何董事會成員持有股份。考慮到我們沒有掌握內部持股情況,我們可能有缺失的數據。因此,有趣的是評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of China Aerospace Times Electronics. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有中國航天時代電子 53% 的所有權。通過這種所有權,零售投資者可以共同發揮作用,影響影響股東回報的決策,如紅利政策和董事任命。他們也可以行使投票權,對不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 27%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私營企業擁有該公司發行股份的 27%。私營企業可能是相關方。有時,內部人士通過在私營企業持有而不是以個人身份持有公共公司的股份來參與公共公司。雖然難以得出任何廣泛結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with China Aerospace Times Electronics .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,你應該注意到我們發現的1個關於航天電子的警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論