share_log

Private Companies Who Hold 41% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) Gained 14%, Institutions Profited as Well

Private Companies Who Hold 41% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) Gained 14%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的私有化公司持股比例爲41%,獲利14%,機構也有獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 21:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • 37% of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd is held by Institutions
  • 晶晨股份(上海)有限公司被私營企業所持有的相當大的股份說明它們共同在管理和業務策略方面具有更多的說法權。
  • 該公司的前五大股東擁有51%的股份。
  • 晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的37%股份由機構持有。

Every investor in Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的每個投資者都應該意識到最有力的股東群體。在該公司中持有最多股票的群體,精確到約41%的私營企業。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥26b last week, while institutions who own 37% also benefitted.

市值上週觸及260億人民幣後,私營企業獲得了最大的收益,持有37%的機構也受益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd.

在下面的表格中,我們放大了晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688099 Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
SHSE:688099所有權分佈圖(2024年6月18日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd?

機構投資者在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司中持有相當數量的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價下跌也是很常見的。因此,值得檢查晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,機構投資者在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司中持有相當數量的股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價下跌也是很常見的。因此,值得檢查晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688099 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
SHSE:688099收益和營業收入增長情況(2024年6月18日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. Amlogic (Hong Kong) Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 6.3% of the stock.

我們注意到,對晶晨股份(上海)有限公司沒有什麼實質性投資的對沖基金。晶晨股份(香港)有限公司是目前最大的股東,持有29%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有的股票數量約爲7.6%和6.3%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd

晶晨股份(上海)有限公司內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥2.5m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司內部人員擁有不到1%的股份。但是,我們注意到,內部人員可能通過私營企業或其他企業結構間接擁有利益。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員擁有公司的實質性利益,而不佔比例利益也是可能的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約250萬元的股份(以當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好的,但檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私營企業擁有已發行股份的41%。私營企業可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私營企業的股份而非個人身份來投資公共公司。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但需要注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我非常有興趣了解誰真正擁有一家公司。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。請注意,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該了解該信號......

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論