share_log

Returns At Clorox (NYSE:CLX) Appear To Be Weighed Down

Returns At Clorox (NYSE:CLX) Appear To Be Weighed Down

高樂氏(紐交所:CLX)的回報似乎受到拖累
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 07:21

There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, while the ROCE is currently high for Clorox (NYSE:CLX), we aren't jumping out of our chairs because returns are decreasing.

如果我們想確定下一個多功能裝袋機,有一些關鍵趨勢需要關注。理想情況下,企業將表現出兩種趨勢;首先是增長 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE),其次是增加 金額 所用資本的比例。如果你看到這一點,這通常意味着它是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。話雖如此,儘管高樂氏(紐約證券交易所代碼:CLX)目前的投資回報率很高,但我們並不是因爲回報率下降而跳出困境。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

什麼是資本使用回報率(ROCE)?

Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Clorox:

爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。分析師使用這個公式來計算 Clorox 的值:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.23 = US$915m ÷ (US$5.8b - US$1.8b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

0.23 = 9.15億美元 ÷(58億美元-18億美元) (基於截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)

Thus, Clorox has an ROCE of 23%. In absolute terms that's a very respectable return and compared to the Household Products industry average of 19% it's pretty much on par.

因此,高樂氏的投資回報率爲23%。從絕對值來看,這是一個非常可觀的回報,與家居用品行業平均水平的19%相比,回報率幾乎相當。

roce
NYSE:CLX Return on Capital Employed June 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CLX 2024年6月18日動用資本回報率

In the above chart we have measured Clorox's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Clorox .

在上圖中,我們將高樂氏先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了比較,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你想了解分析師對未來的預測,你應該查看我們的免費高樂氏分析師報告。

The Trend Of ROCE

ROCE 的趨勢

There hasn't been much to report for Clorox's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So while the current operations are delivering respectable returns, unless capital employed increases we'd be hard-pressed to believe it's a multi-bagger going forward. That being the case, it makes sense that Clorox has been paying out 73% of its earnings to its shareholders. These mature businesses typically have reliable earnings and not many places to reinvest them, so the next best option is to put the earnings into shareholders pockets.

關於Clorox的回報率及其資本利用水平,沒有太多可報告的,因爲這兩個指標在過去五年中一直保持穩定。具有這些特徵的企業往往是成熟而穩定的運營,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,儘管目前的業務帶來了可觀的回報,但除非資本使用量增加,否則我們很難相信未來會是一個多口袋。既然如此,高樂氏將其收益的73%支付給股東是有道理的。這些成熟的企業通常有可靠的收益,可以再投資的地方不多,因此下一個最佳選擇是將收益存入股東的口袋。

The Key Takeaway

關鍵要點

While Clorox has impressive profitability from its capital, it isn't increasing that amount of capital. And with the stock having returned a mere 2.3% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. As a result, if you're hunting for a multi-bagger, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.

儘管高樂氏的資本盈利能力令人印象深刻,但它並沒有增加那麼多的資本。而且,在過去五年中,該股向股東的回報率僅爲2.3%,你可以說他們意識到這些乏善可陳的趨勢。因此,如果你正在尋找一臺多袋裝機,我們認爲你在其他地方會有更多的運氣。

If you want to know some of the risks facing Clorox we've found 3 warning signs (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

如果你想了解高樂氏面臨的一些風險,我們已經發現了 3 個警告信號(1 個對我們來說不太合適!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you want to search for more stocks that have been earning high returns, check out this free list of stocks with solid balance sheets that are also earning high returns on equity.

如果你想搜索更多獲得高回報的股票,可以查看這份資產負債表穩健且淨資產回報率也很高的股票的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論