Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:FBRT) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 5.0% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:FBRT) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 5.0% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Franklin BSP Realty Trust implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在富蘭克林BSP房地產信託的實質性持股意味着它們對公司股價具有重要影響。
- 前19大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
Every investor in Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE:FBRT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 61% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: FBRT) 的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東組。持有公司股份最多的組別,尤其是約佔61%的機構,可以用另一種方式表述,即該組面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Last week's 5.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 1.0% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週5.0%的漲幅意味着機構投資者處於積極的一面,即使該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢。股東的一年回報率目前爲1.0%,上週的漲幅就更是錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Franklin BSP Realty Trust, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究富蘭克林BSP房地產信託的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Franklin BSP Realty Trust?
機構所有權對富蘭克林BSP房地產信託公司的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Franklin BSP Realty Trust. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Franklin BSP Realty Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所見,機構投資者在富蘭克林BSP房地產信託公司擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是警惕依賴機構投資者所謂的認證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得一提的是,還有其他因素需要考慮。當然,也要記住其他因素。下面是富蘭克林BSP房地產信託的過去收益軌跡。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Franklin BSP Realty Trust. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 4.0% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有的股份超過發行股票的一半,公司董事會可能會密切關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對富蘭克林BSP房地產信託沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。黑石集團目前是最大的股東,持股比例爲17%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和4.0%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記簿,我們可以看到前19名股東控制了50%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌控着多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Franklin BSP Realty Trust
富蘭克林BSP房地產信託的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$7.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,富蘭克林BSP房地產信託公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值730萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買賣也同樣重要。您可以單擊此處以查看內部人士是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Franklin BSP Realty Trust. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有富蘭克林BSP房地產信託公司的38%股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Franklin BSP Realty Trust is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...
儘管考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,Franklin BSP Realty Trust 在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警告信號,其中1個對我們來說並不太好……
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com