share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore TETRA Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TTI) Recent US$51m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore TETRA Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TTI) Recent US$51m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略TETRA Technologies, Inc.(紐交所:TTI)最近5,100萬美元的市值下跌,因爲長期利潤保持穩定。
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 10:23

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, TETRA Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders own 10% of TETRA Technologies
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中所持有的大量股份,脂鯉技術的股價可能會因他們的交易決策而變得脆弱。
  • 共有14名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,佔有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員持有脂鯉技術的10%股份。

Every investor in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:TTI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

所有脂鯉技術股票的股東(NYSE:TTI)都應該了解最強大的股東群體。隨着機構持有70%的股份,該集團擁有公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最多的利益(或者如果有下降,將失去最多的利益)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$422m last week. However, the 12% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

在上週公司的市值下降至4.22億美元后,機構投資者是受到最大影響的一個群體。但是,股東們在一年中獲得了12%的回報,這可能減輕了打擊。但他們很可能對未來的損失持謹慎態度。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TETRA Technologies.

在下圖中,我們放大了脂鯉技術的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TTI Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
NYSE:TTI所有權分佈2024年6月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TETRA Technologies?

機構所有權對脂鯉技術有何含義?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in TETRA Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TETRA Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在脂鯉技術有着相當大的持股。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票並喜歡它。但是,就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出股票,很容易看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查脂鯉技術過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TTI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
NYSE:TTI盈利和營業收入增長2024年6月18日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in TETRA Technologies. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 5.8% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Brady Murphy is the owner of 1.7% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者持有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於脂鯉技術而言,對沖基金持股不多。目前黑石集團是最大的股東,佔有7.8%的流通股。與之相比,第二和第三大股東持有約6.3%和5.8%的股份。此外,首席執行官布雷迪·墨菲擁有公司1.7%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更仔細的研究表明,前14名股東擁有50%的股權,意味着沒有單一股東持有絕對多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of TETRA Technologies

脂鯉技術的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Insiders have a US$43m stake in this US$422m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人員在脂鯉技術中持有很大的股份。內部人員擁有這家價值4.22億美元的公司的4300萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人員可能創辦了這家公司。您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand TETRA Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that TETRA Technologies is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

總之,了解持股人的不同群體始終是值得考慮的問題。但是,要更好地了解脂鯉技術,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,脂鯉技術在我們的投資分析中有一個警告信號,您應該知道……

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論