share_log

Is FirstEnergy (NYSE:FE) Using Too Much Debt?

Is FirstEnergy (NYSE:FE) Using Too Much Debt?

第一能源(NYSE:FE)是否使用過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 11:44

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE:FE) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們可以看到,FirstEnergy Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FE)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得有風險。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司會永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款機構迫使他們以不利的價格籌集資金。但是,通過取代稀釋,對於需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說,債務可以成爲一個非常好的工具。當我們研究債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does FirstEnergy Carry?

FirstEnergy 揹負了多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 FirstEnergy had US$24.5b of debt, an increase on US$22.7b, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$888.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$23.6b.

你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年3月,FirstEnergy在一年內有245億美元的債務,比227億美元有所增加。另一方面,它擁有8.88億美元的現金,淨負債約爲236億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:FE Debt to Equity History June 20th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FE 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 6 月 20 日

How Strong Is FirstEnergy's Balance Sheet?

FirstEnergy的資產負債表有多強勁?

According to the last reported balance sheet, FirstEnergy had liabilities of US$6.27b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$31.4b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$888.0m and US$2.12b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$34.7b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,FirstEnergy的負債爲62.7億美元,12個月後到期的負債爲314億美元。另一方面,它有一年內到期的8.88億美元現金和價值21.2億美元的應收賬款。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出347億美元。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$22.0b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, FirstEnergy would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

這裏的缺陷嚴重影響了這家價值220億美元的公司本身,就好像一個孩子在裝滿書本、運動裝備和喇叭的巨大揹包的重壓下掙扎一樣。因此,毫無疑問,我們將密切關注其資產負債表。畢竟,如果FirstEnergy今天必須向債權人付款,則可能需要進行大規模的資本重組。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。

Weak interest cover of 2.0 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.2 hit our confidence in FirstEnergy like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. Given the debt load, it's hardly ideal that FirstEnergy's EBIT was pretty flat over the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine FirstEnergy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

2.0倍的薄弱利息覆蓋率和令人不安的高淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率6.2打擊了我們對FirstEnergy的信心,就像是一二衝擊直覺。這裏的債務負擔是沉重的。考慮到債務負擔,FirstEnergy的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中保持相當平穩並不理想。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益將決定FirstEnergy未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, FirstEnergy saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,值得檢查一下息稅前利潤中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的三年中,FirstEnergy的自由現金流總額爲負數。儘管投資者無疑預計這種情況將在適當的時候逆轉,但這顯然意味着其使用債務的風險更大。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, FirstEnergy's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. It's also worth noting that FirstEnergy is in the Electric Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think FirstEnergy has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that FirstEnergy is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...

從表面上看,FirstEnergy的淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤讓我們對該股持初步看法,其將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。但至少其息稅前利潤增長率還不錯。還值得注意的是,FirstEnergy屬於電力公用事業行業,人們通常認爲該行業具有很強的防禦性。在考慮了所討論的數據點之後,我們認爲FirstEnergy的債務太多了。儘管有些投資者喜歡這種冒險的遊戲,但這肯定不是我們的好選擇。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。請注意,FirstEnergy在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,其中一個有點令人不快...

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論