share_log

Centessa Pharmaceuticals Plc's (NASDAQ:CNTA) Institutional Investors Lost 12% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Centessa Pharmaceuticals Plc's (NASDAQ:CNTA) Institutional Investors Lost 12% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Centessa藥品股份有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CNTA)的機構投資者在過去一週中損失了12%,但從長期收益中獲利
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 11:59

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Centessa Pharmaceuticals' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構的持股比例顯著較高,意味着Centessa Pharmaceuticals的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:CNTA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:CNTA)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強有力的股東群體。機構持有42%的股份,是該公司中持股最多的群體,即如果股票上漲,則該群體最受益(或股票下跌則損失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 12% last week. However, the 50% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

在投資方面虧損絕不是任何股東所喜歡的,機構投資者如果上週觀察他們的持股市值下跌了12%,這在與一年50%的股東回報中,可能會有所緩解。但他們在未來還需要持續關注這家公司的弱點。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Centessa Pharmaceuticals.

讓我們更近距離地了解一下Centessa Pharmaceuticals的不同類型的股東可以告訴我們些什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CNTA Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
納斯達克股市(CNTA)所有股權分配(截至2024年6月20日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Centessa Pharmaceuticals?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Centessa Pharmaceuticals的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Centessa Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Centessa Pharmaceuticals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Centessa Pharmaceuticals確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有些信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一隻股票,股價大跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Centessa Pharmaceuticals的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CNTA Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
納斯達克股市(CNTA)盈利和營收增長(截至2024年6月20日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Centessa Pharmaceuticals. The company's largest shareholder is Medicxi Ventures (UK) LLP, with ownership of 18%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到對於Centessa Pharmaceuticals,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資,該公司最大的股東是Medicxi Ventures(UK)LLP,擁有18%的所有權。爲了了解情況,第二大股東持有約8.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有8.6%的所有權。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Centessa Pharmaceuticals

Centessa Pharmaceuticals股東層面情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc. It has a market capitalization of just US$963m, and insiders have US$20m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告說,內部人員確實擁有Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc的股份,它的市值僅爲9.63億美元,內部人員自己名下擁有2千萬美元的股份,這很不錯,但考慮到這些內部人員是否一直在買入股份也是值得注意的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Centessa Pharmaceuticals. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有Centessa Pharmaceuticals的21%股份,雖然該群體不能直接控制公司,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 35%, private equity firms could influence the Centessa Pharmaceuticals board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

佔股35%的私人股權投資公司可能對Centessa Pharmaceuticals的管理層產生影響。某些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲私募股權投資公司有時能夠鼓勵出使市場認識到公司的價值的策略。或者這些持股人在將其上市後退出了該投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Centessa Pharmaceuticals you should know about.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如風險考慮。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Centessa Pharmaceuticals有2個警告標誌,你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論