Intco Medical Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300677) 4.0% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders
Intco Medical Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300677) 4.0% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Intco Medical Technology's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insider ownership in Intco Medical Technology is 36%
- 英科醫療擁有衆多的零售投資者,這表明其重要決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
- 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 英科醫療技術的內部持股比例爲36%。
Every investor in Intco Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300677) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
英科醫療股份有限公司(SZSE:300677)的每位投資者都應該注意最強股東群體。持有公司股票數量最多的群體,精確地說是約47%,是散戶投資者。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥17b last week, while insiders who own 36% also benefitted.
當市值上漲到170億元人民幣上週,零售投資者獲得了最多收益,而持有36%股份的內部人員也從中獲益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Intco Medical Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解英科醫療科技的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intco Medical Technology?
機構持股在英科醫療方面告訴我們什麼? 英科醫療技術已經有機構在股東名冊上。他們在公司中擁有相當大的一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者之間有一定的信譽。但是僅憑這個事實是不夠的,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構擁有股票時,存在一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當此類交易出現問題時,可能有多方競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到英科醫療科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事還有更多。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Intco Medical Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Intco Medical Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
英科醫療科技已經有機構在股東名冊上。他們在公司中擁有相當大的一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者之間有一定的信譽。但是僅憑這個事實是不夠的,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構擁有股票時,存在一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當此類交易出現問題時,可能有多方競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到英科醫療科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事還有更多。
Intco Medical Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Fang Yi Liu is currently the largest shareholder, with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.3% and 2.1% of the stock.
英科醫療技術不是由對沖基金持有的。劉芳毅目前是最大的股東,持有36%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有的股份約爲2.3%和2.1%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Intco Medical Technology
英科醫療技術的內部持股比例如何? 我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有英科醫療技術有限公司的相當比例。它的市值僅爲170億元人民幣,內部人員擁有自己名下共61億元人民幣的股份。這非常重要。 大多數人都希望看到董事會與他們一起投資。 你可能想訪問這個圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易情況。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Intco Medical Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥17b, and insiders have CN¥6.1b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我非常有興趣查看到底是誰擁有一家公司。但是爲了真正獲得洞見,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現英科醫療技術有1個警告標誌,您應該注意。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有公司47%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然佔有大量股份,但如果決策不符合其他大股東的意願,則這種所有權規模可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Intco Medical Technology you should be aware of.
我認爲深入研究公司股權所有人信息非常有趣,但如果想要真正了解情況,我們需要考慮其他信息。一個例子是:我們發現了英科醫療股份有限公司存在一個警示信號,你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com