share_log

Recent 5.8% Pullback Would Hurt Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991) Insiders

Recent 5.8% Pullback Would Hurt Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991) Insiders

最近的5.8%回撤將對甘源食品股份有限公司(SZSE:002991)內部人士造成傷害。
Simply Wall St ·  06/21 20:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Ganyuan Foods implies vested interests in company growth
  • 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Binsheng Yan)
  • Institutions own 20% of Ganyuan Foods
  • 甘源食品的重要內部控制意味着股東在公司的成長方向上有既得利益。
  • 57%的公司股份由單一股東(晏斌聖)持有。
  • 機構擁有甘源食品的20%股份。

If you want to know who really controls Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制甘源食品股份有限公司(SZSE:002991),那麼您需要看一下該公司股份持有者構成。我們可以看到個人內部股東持有了該公司63%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面對的可能出現的上漲或下跌風險最大。

As market cap fell to CN¥5.9b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着市值去年下跌至59億元,內部股東將面臨比公司其他股東群體更大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ganyuan Foods.

下面的圖表展示了甘源食品不同股東群體的股份情況。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002991 Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
SZSE:002991所有權結構分佈圖 2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ganyuan Foods?

機構持股情況能告訴我們關於甘源食品的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ganyuan Foods. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ganyuan Foods' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在甘源食品中持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者對該公司有一定的信譽,但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得下面的甘源食品收益歷史圖表的參考。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002991 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
SZSE:002991收益和營業收入增長圖表 2024年6月22日

Ganyuan Foods is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Binsheng Yan is the largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

甘源食品不是由對沖基金所持有。我們的數據顯示,晏斌聖是最大的股東,持有57%的流通股份。由於持有如此大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來具有重要控制權。爲作比較,第二大股東持股量約爲6.1%,第三大股東持股量爲4.9%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ganyuan Foods

甘源食品的內部股權情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥3.7b stake in this CN¥5.9b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部股東持有甘源食品股份有限公司超過一半。這使得他們能夠有效地掌控公司。因此,他們在這家市值達到59億元的公司中擁有37億元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個好的跡象,表明內部股東與股東擁有強大的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部股東是否有買賣行爲。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ganyuan Foods. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有16%的普通股股份的公衆大多由個人投資者組成,對甘源食品有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能完全決定公司的大局,但肯定對公司的經營產生了實際的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ganyuan Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ganyuan Foods has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

考慮到擁有某家公司的股票的不同股東群體總是值得思考的問題,但要更好地理解甘源食品,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險——我們認爲甘源食品存在2個警示信號(其中1個是重大警示信號),您可以點擊此處了解詳情。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論