share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

機構投資者在聯邦農業抵押貸款公司(紐交所:AGM)擁有71%的股權,資金壓力較大。
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 09:15

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Federal Agricultural Mortgage implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構在聯邦農業抵押貸款公司的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重要影響。
  • 總共有20位股東持有該公司的50%股權
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解誰真正控制着聯邦農業抵押貸款公司(NYSE:AGM),了解該公司的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有公司的最大股份,佔71%的股份。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的利益(或最大的損失)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.0% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 27% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

因此,機構投資者在該公司的股價上漲3.0%後獲得了最豐厚的回報。股東一年的回報率目前爲27%,上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federal Agricultural Mortgage.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對聯邦農業抵押貸款公司能夠提供哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AGM Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
NYSE:AGM所有權拆分2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federal Agricultural Mortgage?

機構所有權對聯邦農業抵押貸款公司意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Federal Agricultural Mortgage already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Federal Agricultural Mortgage, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

聯邦農業抵押貸款公司已經有機構進入股份登記冊。事實上,他們擁有相當大的股份,這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不良的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,大股價下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查聯邦農業抵押貸款公司的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AGM Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
NYSE:AGM收入和營收增長情況2024年6月22日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.3% of shares outstanding. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.3% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.4% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對聯邦農業抵押貸款公司而言,對沖基金並沒有太多的股份。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有7.3%的流通股,而FMR LLC是第二大股東,佔普通股的6.3%,而領先集團公關公司則持有約5.4%的公司股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更多深入調查,我們發現前20大股東在該公司中擁有的股權總共佔50%,表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Federal Agricultural Mortgage

聯邦農業抵押貸款公司內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$27m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部人士持有聯邦農業抵押貸款公司的股份。這是一家很大的公司,所以看到一些潛在的利益相關方持有股份通常是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2700萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但考慮到這些內部人士是否一直在拋售股份也是值得檢查的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常,個人投資者作爲一般公衆持有聯邦農業抵押貸款公司的28%股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的有利條件下影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Federal Agricultural Mortgage , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體很值得,但其它更重要的因素還有要考慮。例如,投資風險這個永恒的降臨者。我們已經識別出一種警示標誌,聯邦農業抵押貸款公司需要認真研究並納入您的投資流程中。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論