share_log

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SWBI) US$77m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 9.5% Returns

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SWBI) US$77m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 9.5% Returns

一年中獲得9.5%回報後,史密斯威森品牌公司的市值下降了7700萬美元,但機構投資者可能忽略了這一點。(納斯達克股票代碼:SWBI)
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 09:48

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Smith & Wesson Brands' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 考慮到機構大量持股,Smith & Wesson Brands的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響。
  • 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWBI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Smith & Wesson Brands,股份註冊表的配置就是重點。 佔公司股份最多的持有者群體,精確地說是約54%的機構。 換句話說,該組面臨的最大上漲潛力(或下降風險)是最高的。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$77m last week. However, the 9.5% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週公司市值下跌7,700萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。然而,9.5%的一年回報率可能有助於緩解其總體損失。但他們可能對未來的損失感到警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Smith & Wesson Brands.

在下面的圖表中,我們會關注 Smith & Wesson Brands 的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SWBI Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
NasdaqGS: SWBI股權結構2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Smith & Wesson Brands?

機構持股告訴我們關於Smith & Wesson Brands的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Smith & Wesson Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Smith & Wesson Brands' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Smith & Wesson Brands確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。 這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 然而,最好不要依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。 他們錯誤的時候也有。 當多個機構擁有股票時,總會存在他們處於“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面都可能會競相拋售股票。 在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以看到下面 Smith & Wesson Brands 的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SWBI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
NasdaqGS: SWBI收益和營收增長2024年6月22日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 6.0% of Smith & Wesson Brands shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 9.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數的已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。 看起來BlackRock,Inc擁有公司9.3%的流通股最多,其次是第二和第三大股東,他們分別擁有7.9%和6.6%的流通股。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Smith & Wesson Brands

Smith & Wesson Brands的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$747m, and insiders have US$10m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有Smith & Wesson Brands股份。 其市值僅爲7.47億美元,內部人員擁有自己名下價值1000萬美元的股票。 有人會說這表明股東和董事會的利益一致。 但最好檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Smith & Wesson Brands. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔公司股份38%的普通公衆,主要包括個人投資者,可以對Smith & Wesson Brands產生一定影響。 股份這麼大,雖然可觀,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Smith & Wesson Brands better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Smith & Wesson Brands that you should be aware of before investing here.

思考擁有公司股份的不同人群總是值得的。 但是要更好地了解Smith & Wesson Brands,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們爲Smith & Wesson Brands發現了1個警告信號, 在這裏投資之前應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論