share_log

Retail Investors Among Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd's (SZSE:300769) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.9% Price Drop

Retail Investors Among Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd's (SZSE:300769) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.9% Price Drop

德方納米(SZSE:300769)的最大股東之一是散戶投資者,上週7.9%的股價下跌給他們帶來衝擊。
Simply Wall St ·  06/23 20:35

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Shenzhen Dynanonic by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Shenzhen Dynanonic is 31%
  • 零售投資者對德方納米的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更大的權力影響管理和治理相關決策
  • 最高的24位股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 德方納米的內部持股率爲31%

Every investor in Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd (SZSE:300769) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

深圳德方納米股份有限公司(SZSE:300769)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。而持有公司44%股權的股東群體擁有最大的利益。換句話說,該群體從他們對公司的投資中將獲得最多的利益(或承受最大的損失)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 7.9% price drop, insiders with their 31% also suffered.

雖然上週德方納米股價下跌了7.9%,零售投資者的持股份額也受到了衝擊,但擁有31%股份比例的內部股東也同樣蒙受了虧損

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Dynanonic, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討德方納米的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300769 Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
SZSE:300769 2024年6月24日所有權歸屬

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Dynanonic?

機構投資者擁有的股份告訴我們關於德方納米的更多信息

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Dynanonic. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shenzhen Dynanonic's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在德方納米擁有一定的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過這支股票並且認爲它值得投資。但就像其他普通投資者一樣,他們可能也犯錯。當多個機構購買同一支股票時,他們可能會同時出售這些股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更大。您可以看到德方納米的歷年收益和營業收入,但請記住,還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300769 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
SZSE:300769 2024年6月24日收益和營業收入增長

Shenzhen Dynanonic is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Xuewen Ji, with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 4.1% of the stock. Lingyong Kong, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

德方納米不被對沖基金擁有。該公司最大的股東是季學文,持股比例爲14%。與之相比,第二大和第三大股東持有該公司約13%和4.1%的股份。同時,持有首席執行官頭銜的孔令勇是第二大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 24 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據可以發現,前24名股東持有的股份總合佔50%,意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Dynanonic

德方納米內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd. Insiders own CN¥2.5b worth of shares in the CN¥8.3b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來內部人員擁有德方納米的相當一部分股份。內部人員持有8.3億人民幣公司價值2.5億人民幣的股票,這相當有意義。很高興看到這樣的投資。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人員最近是否一直在購買該公司的股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Shenzhen Dynanonic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有德方納米44%的股份。這樣大的所有權份額雖然可觀,但如果其決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Shenzhen Dynanonic that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了深圳德方納米的1個警告信號,您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論