share_log

We Think Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) Can Manage Its Debt With Ease

We Think Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) Can Manage Its Debt With Ease

我們認爲藝電(納斯達克股票代碼:EA)可以輕鬆管理其債務。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 06:51

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ:EA) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”因此,很明顯,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。我們可以看到,電子藝術公司(納斯達克股票代碼:EA)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債就會面臨風險。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,許多公司使用債務爲增長提供資金,而不會產生任何負面影響。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does Electronic Arts Carry?

電子藝術揹負了多少債務?

As you can see below, Electronic Arts had US$1.88b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. But it also has US$3.26b in cash to offset that, meaning it has US$1.38b net cash.

如下所示,截至2024年3月,電子藝術的債務爲18.8億美元,與前一年大致相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。但它也有32.6億美元的現金可以抵消這一點,這意味着它的淨現金爲13.8億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:EA Debt to Equity History June 24th 2024
NasdaqGS: EA 債券與股本比率 2024 年 6 月 24 日

How Strong Is Electronic Arts' Balance Sheet?

Electronic Arts的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Electronic Arts had liabilities of US$3.09b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.82b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$3.26b as well as receivables valued at US$565.0m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$2.08b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,Electronic Arts的負債爲30.9億美元,一年後到期的負債爲28.2億美元。除這些債務外,它有32.6億美元的現金以及價值5.65億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出20.8億美元。

Of course, Electronic Arts has a titanic market capitalization of US$37.0b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Electronic Arts also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely.

當然,Electronic Arts的市值高達370億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,我們確實認爲值得關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲它可能會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。儘管確實有值得注意的負債,但Electronic Arts的現金也多於債務,因此我們非常有信心它可以安全地管理債務。

The good news is that Electronic Arts has increased its EBIT by 8.1% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Electronic Arts's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

好消息是,Electronic Arts在十二個月內將其息稅前利潤增長了8.1%,這應該可以緩解對債務償還的任何擔憂。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益比什麼都重要,將決定Electronic Arts未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. Electronic Arts may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the last three years, Electronic Arts actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.

最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。Electronic Arts的資產負債表上可能有淨現金,但看看該企業如何將其利息稅前收益(EBIT)轉換爲自由現金流仍然很有趣,因爲這將影響其對債務的需求和管理債務的能力。在過去的三年中,電子藝術產生的自由現金流實際上超過了息稅前利潤。當Daft Punk音樂會的節拍下降時,這種強勁的現金轉換讓我們和觀衆一樣興奮。

Summing Up

總結

We could understand if investors are concerned about Electronic Arts's liabilities, but we can be reassured by the fact it has has net cash of US$1.38b. And it impressed us with free cash flow of US$2.1b, being 119% of its EBIT. So is Electronic Arts's debt a risk? It doesn't seem so to us. Another factor that would give us confidence in Electronic Arts would be if insiders have been buying shares: if you're conscious of that signal too, you can find out instantly by clicking this link.

我們可以理解投資者是否擔心Electronic Arts的負債,但其淨現金爲13.8億美元,這一事實可以使我們放心。它以21億美元的自由現金流給我們留下了深刻的印象,佔其息稅前利潤的119%。那麼 Electronic Arts 的債務是一種風險嗎?在我們看來,情況並非如此。另一個讓我們對Electronic Arts充滿信心的因素是內部人士是否一直在購買股票:如果你也意識到這個信號,你可以通過點擊這個鏈接立即找到答案。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論