Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002080) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002080) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 60% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Building Material Company Limited)
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 中材科技的重要上市公司所有權表明,核心決策受到來自更大公衆股東的影響。
- 公司的60%由一個股東持有(中國建材股份有限公司)。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002080) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 60% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察中材科技股份有限公司(深交所:002080)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。公共公司持有最多的股權,佔60%。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥22b last week, public companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由於市值上週跌至220億元,公共公司將面臨該公司股東中最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了中材科技股份有限公司不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd?
機構投資者對中材科技股份有限公司有何看法?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,中材科技股份有限公司確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看中材科技股份有限公司過去的收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is China National Building Material Company Limited, with ownership of 60%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. National Council for Social Security Fund is the second largest shareholder owning 1.1% of common stock, and China Asset Management Co. Ltd. holds about 0.9% of the company stock.
我們注意到對中材科技股份有限公司沒有任何有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司的最大股東是中國建材股份有限公司,持股60%。由於持有如此巨大的股權,我們推斷他們對公司未來有重大控制權。全國社會保障基金理事會是第二大股東,擁有普通股的1.1%,而中國資產管理股份有限公司持有公司股票的0.9%左右。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd
中材科技股份有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我們注意到我們的數據並沒有顯示任何董事會成員擁有股份。董事會成員至少擁有一些個人持倉是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步是檢查CEO的薪酬水平。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
看來私營公司持有大華股份的9.0%。僅從這個事實中很難得出任何結論,所以值得調查一下這些私營公司的所有人是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能會通過一個單獨的私營公司擁有公開公司的股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 60% of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
公共公司目前擁有中材科技股份有限公司的60%股票。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一種戰略股份。這些企業可能非常相似,或者彼此合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體確實很值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,中材科技股份有限公司顯示出投資分析中的四個警告信號,您應該知道......
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com