share_log

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 5.6% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 5.6% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

海科b股(SHSE:600751)上週股價下跌5.6%;個人投資者肯定不會感到高興。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in HNA TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 21 shareholders own 45% of the company
  • 16% of HNA TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
  • HNA TechnologyLtd中個人投資者持有相當大的股份,表明他們在管理和業務策略方面具有更多的話語權。
  • 前21大股東擁有該公司45%的股份。
  • 機構持有HNA TechnologyLtd的股份爲16%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751)真正控制權的情況,了解企業的股權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司55%的所有權。這意味着,如果股票上漲(或下跌),該組織將獲得最大的利益(或損失最大)。

As a result, individual investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥377m.

因此,在上週市值下跌37700萬人民幣後,個人投資者作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of HNA TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討HNA TechnologyLtd的每一種所有者類型,從下圖開始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600751 Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
SHSE:600751所有權結構2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HNA TechnologyLtd?

機構投資者在HNA TechnologyLtd擁有相當多的權益。這可能表明該企業在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也有錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,它們總是存在“集體交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現意外事故時,多個方總會競相迅速賣出股票。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到HNA TechnologyLtd的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住事情並不僅如此。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HNA TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HNA TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在HNA TechnologyLtd中擁有相當多的權益。這可能表明該公司在投資社區具有一定的可信度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。它們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們參與的“操縱交易”的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一家沒有歷史增長記錄的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看HNA TechnologyLtd的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住事情並不僅僅如此。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600751 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
對沖基金在HNA TechnologyLtd中沒有很多股票。該公司最大的股東是CITIC Group Corporation,擁有29%的股份。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約14%的流通股,第三大股東持有0.7%的股份。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in HNA TechnologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is CITIC Group Corporation, with ownership of 29%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

不同股東類型擁有HNA TechnologyLtd的權益比例如下。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 21 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

更深入地了解我們的所有權數據,顯示前21名股東共同持有註冊公司的一半以下的股份,這表明有大量小股東的大團體,沒有單一的股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of HNA TechnologyLtd

HNA TechnologyLtd內部股份爲股東自有股不到1%。但請注意,股東可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構來間接持有股權。董事會持有價值860萬元人民幣的股票。這與市值爲59億元人民幣相比較。許多人都傾向於看到持股更多的董事會。一個很好的下一步可能是查看這篇有關內部買賣的免費摘要。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It appears that the board holds about CN¥8.6m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of CN¥5.9b. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有HNA TechnologyLtd的55%的股份,這表明它是一支相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平使得更廣泛的公衆投資者有許多權力來影響關鍵的政策決策,如董事會組成、高管薪酬和分紅比率。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 55% stake in HNA TechnologyLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

私人公司持有HNA TechnologyLtd股份的29%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人通過持有私人公司而不是以個人身份擁有公共公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 29%, of the HNA TechnologyLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我認爲查看一個公司的真正擁有者非常有趣。但是,爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險- HNA TechnologyLtd有2個警告信號(和一個令人關注的信號)我們認爲你應該知道。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - HNA TechnologyLtd has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.

我認爲查看企業的真正所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險- HNA TechnologyLtd有2個警告信號(和一個令人關注的信號)我們認爲你應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論