share_log

C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000950) Last Week's 5.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000950) Last Week's 5.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

重藥控股有限公司(SZSE:000950)上週下跌5.5%,一定讓重要股東的民營企業感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 18:36

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 私人公司對重藥控股的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的影響和管理權決策力。
  • 前2大股東擁有該公司的55%股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

Every investor in C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000950) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

所有重藥控股股東應該注意最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到私人公司擁有該公司57%的股份所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該股東群體將獲益最多(或者在市場下跌時會蒙受最大損失)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 5.5%.

上週,私人公司遭受了市場下跌5.5%的最大損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding.

讓我們更仔細地了解一下不同類型的股東對重藥控股所代表者什麼意義。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:000950 Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
SZSE:000950控股結構(截至2024年6月25日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding?

機構持股對重藥控股公司有什麼提醒?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

重藥控股公司已擁有股份登記制度機構。他們在公司中擁有高顯著的股權,這意味着專業投資者之間的信譽可信。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲就像每個人一樣,機構有時會做出糟糕的投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一家股票,很常見的是其股價會大幅下跌。因此,了解重藥控股的過去收益軌跡也很值得一看(如下所示)。當然,還需要考慮其他的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:000950 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
SZSE:000950收入和營業額增長情況截至2024年6月25日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding. Our data shows that Chongqing Pharmaceutical Health Industry Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Chongqing City Construction Investment (Group) Co.,Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Chongqing Yufu Capital Equity Investment Fund Management Co. holds about 3.2% of the company stock.

對於重藥控股,對沖基金並沒有很多的股份。我們的數據顯示,重慶市藥品保健行業有限公司是最大的股東,擁有該公司38%的流通股,其次是重慶市城市建設投資(集團)有限公司,持有16%的普通股,重慶宇富資本股權投資基金管理有限公司持有該公司約3.2%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究顯示,前兩名股東中有2人持有該公司約55%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。

Insider Ownership Of C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding

重藥控股的內部所有者權益

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding Co., Ltd. in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥5.3m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人以自己的名義擁有不到1%的重藥控股股份。然而,內部人可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有利益。這是一家相當大的公司,董事會成員可能擁有公司的大量利益,而比例相對較低。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約爲530萬元人民幣(按當前價格)的股份。看到內部持股至少有一定比例總是很好的,但是值得檢查這些內部人是否在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆通常是個人投資者,持有重藥控股公司30%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響其喜好的政策決策,但仍然可以在公司政策上發揮集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 57%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司上市股份的57%。可能值得更深入地研究一下。如果關聯方如內部人員在這些私營公司之一擁有利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司具有戰略興趣。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 3.9% of C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有重藥控股公司的3.9%。很難確定,但這表明它們具有交織的商業利益。這可能是一個戰略性利益,因此值得密切關注所有權的變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for C.Q. Pharmaceutical Holding (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.

儘管考慮公司的不同持股群體是十分重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經識別出重藥控股公司的三個警告特徵(其中有一個讓我們有些不安) ,你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論