share_log

GrandiT Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688549) Last Week's 8.1% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Equity Firms Who Have a Significant Stake

GrandiT Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688549) Last Week's 8.1% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Equity Firms Who Have a Significant Stake

GrandiT股份有限公司(SHSE:688549)上週下跌8.1%,這一定讓股權投資公司失望了,因爲他們在其中佔有重要的股份
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 19:56

Key Insights

主要見解

  • GrandiT's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • GrandiT顯著的股權投資公司所有權暗示着重要的決策受到來自於更大公衆中的股東的影響。
  • 總共有2家投資者持有該公司53%的所有權。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls GrandiT Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688549), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 33% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制Grandit股份有限公司(SHSE:688549),那麼你需要查看它的股權登記。持有最大份額的是佔有33%所有權的股權投資公司。換句話說,這個群體有可能獲得最多的收益(或最多的損失)從他們投資到公司。

And following last week's 8.1% decline in share price, private equity firms suffered the most losses.

在上週8.1%的股價下跌後,股權投資公司遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of GrandiT, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Grandit的每一種所有人,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688549 Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
SHSE:688549所有權結構2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GrandiT?

機構投資者對GrandiT的持股情況告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GrandiT. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GrandiT, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Grandit中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師們已經看過這支股票並喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣掉一支股票,導致大幅股價下跌並不少見。因此,查看Grandit的過去盈利路徑(如下方)值得一提。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688549 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
SHSE:688549營收和收入增長2024年6月25日

GrandiT is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Huaxin Investment Management Co., Ltd. with 26% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 26% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Grandit不是由對沖基金持有的。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是華信投資管理有限公司,持有26%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的26%和7.3%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of GrandiT

GrandiT內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否持有個人股份。董事會成員至少持有一些個人股份是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行動是檢查CEO的薪資。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GrandiT. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆擁有22%的股權,主要包括個人投資者,對Grandit有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 33%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

佔有33%的股權投資公司有能力在創造價值的基礎上,參與塑造公司策略。有些人會喜歡這一點,因爲股權投資公司有時是挖掘管理層責任的活躍分子。但是有時,股權投資公司是在上市後拋售已經買入的股份。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the GrandiT stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起來,14%的Grandit股票由私人公司擁有。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員對一個公共公司的興趣可能是通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是作爲個人的身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個方向。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 26% of GrandiT. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

看起來我們的公共公司擁有Grandit的26%。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關業務利益。這可能是他們分離的結果。值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand GrandiT better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with GrandiT .

想要了解一家公司,我們必須考慮許多其他因素,也包括持有公司股份的各個群體。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的1個Grandit的警告標誌。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論