Private Companies Among Shanghai Ziyan Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603057) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.8% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Shanghai Ziyan Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603057) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.8% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Shanghai Ziyan Foods' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 3 shareholders own 58% of the company
- Insider ownership in Shanghai Ziyan Foods is 39%
- 上海紫燕食品重要的私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
- 前三大股東佔公司的58%。
- 上海紫燕食品的內部股權佔比爲39%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Ziyan Foods Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603057), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 43% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解上海紫燕食品有誰真正掌控公司,了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。私人公司持有43%的股份,佔公司最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或在經濟下行時失去大部分),這個集團將受益最多(或失去最多)。
Following a 6.8% decrease in the stock price last week, private companies suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 39% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌6.8%,私人公司遭受了最大的損失,但持有39%股票的內部股東也受到了打擊。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Ziyan Foods.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關上海紫燕食品的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Ziyan Foods?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於上海紫燕食品?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Shanghai Ziyan Foods does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Ziyan Foods, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到上海紫燕食品確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可靠性。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,那麼大股價下跌也是常見的。因此,值得檢查上海紫燕食品的過去收入軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。
Shanghai Ziyan Foods is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Ningguo Chuanqin Enterprise Management Consulting Service Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnershi, with ownership of 25%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 19% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Wuchao Ge directly holds 5.6% of the total shares outstanding.
上海紫燕食品不是由對沖基金持有的。該公司最大的股東是寧國川欽企業管理諮詢服務合夥企業(有限夥伴),持有25%的股份。同時,第二第三大股東分別持有19%和14%的流通股,另外,該公司CEO葛武超直接持有總流通股的5.6%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Ziyan Foods
上海紫燕食品的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Ziyan Foods Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.5b worth of shares in the CN¥6.4b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
似乎內部人員持有上海紫燕食品有很大比例的股份。內部人員在總價值爲64億人民幣的公司中持有25億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍擁有很多股份。(點擊此處查看他們是否買入或賣出)。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shanghai Ziyan Foods. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有10%所有權的一般公衆,主要包括個人投資者,對上海紫燕食品具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能掌握所有權,但它肯定會對公司的運營產生實質性影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有發行總股本的43%。僅從這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得了解誰是這些私人公司的所有人。有時,內部人員或其他相關方可能會通過單獨的私人公司在公共公司中擁有股權。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Shanghai Ziyan Foods is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...
我覺得查看公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了獲得更深入的了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,上海紫燕食品製造業在我們的投資分析中顯示出2個警告信號,其中1個令人擔憂...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com