share_log

Beilong Precision Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301567) Top Key Executive Jiong Yang's Holdings Dropped 13% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

Beilong Precision Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301567) Top Key Executive Jiong Yang's Holdings Dropped 13% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

由於最近的回調,北龍精密技術股份有限公司(SZSE:301567)首席高管楊炯的持股價值下降了13%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 20:37

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Beilong Precision Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • 55% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Jiong Yang)
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 北龍精密技術存在着巨額內部控股權,意味着對公司的成長具有既得利益。
  • 55%的北龍精密技術的股份由單一股東(臧炯陽)持有。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Beilong Precision Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301567), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了北龍精密技術股份公司(SZSE:301567),那麼你需要看一下它的股權登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,公司中個人內部持有最多,擁有63%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

上週股價下跌13%,內部人蒙受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Beilong Precision Technology.

在下圖中,我們可以放大看一下北龍精密技術的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:301567 Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
SZSE:301567所有權分佈2024年6月26日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Beilong Precision Technology?

機構持股缺失給北龍精密技術帶來了怎樣的影響?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Beilong Precision Technology might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構不持有某隻股票,原因有很多。最常見的原因是,公司相對於基金管理規模太小,機構沒有必要仔細研究公司。另外,基金經理可能不持有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信它會表現得很好。北龍精密技術可能不具備機構尋找的那種過去表現,或者機構可能沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:301567 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
SZSE:301567營收及收入增長2024年6月26日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Beilong Precision Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Beilong Precision Technology's case, its Top Key Executive, Jiong Yang, is the largest shareholder, holding 55% of shares outstanding. Ningbo Beiyu Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and Yangyang Wang holds about 7.1% of the company stock.

我們注意到,對北龍精密技術沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。因爲行動勝過言辭,當內部持有大量股份的時候,我們認爲這是一個好的跡象。在北龍精密技術的情況下,其高管之一臧炯陽擁有最多的股份,佔流通股的55%。寧波北宇投資合夥企業(有限合夥)是第二大股東,擁有7.5%的普通股,而王陽陽持有公司約7.1%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。

Insider Ownership Of Beilong Precision Technology

北龍精密技術內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Beilong Precision Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥1.8b stake in this CN¥2.8b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部股東擁有北龍精密技術的超過一半的股份。這使得他們有效地掌控了公司。因此,他們在這家28億的公司中擁有1.8億人民幣的股份。這種程度的投資是好事。您可以在這裏查看最近內部人員是否購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Beilong Precision Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般來說,通常是個人投資者持有北龍精密技術的28%的股份。雖然這種所有權不足以在政策決策中左右逢源,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the Beilong Precision Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看來私人公司擁有了北龍精密技術的7.5%的股份。這值得深入研究。如果存在相關方投資,例如內部人員,應在年報中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Beilong Precision Technology has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我覺得看看誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險 - 北龍精密技術有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該了解。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論