Guangdong Deerma Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301332) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Guangdong Deerma Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301332) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Guangdong Deerma Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 私人公司對廣東德爾瑪科技的重要控制權意味着公衆有更多的權力影響管理和治理決策。
- 前三大股東擁有公司的55%股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Guangdong Deerma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301332) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 42% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
觀察股份制度改革層面下廣東德爾瑪科技股東構成,將有助於了解誰手握最大的話語權。股份最多的股東爲私人公司,擁有該公司42%的股份。這也就意味着,如果股票上漲(或下跌),這個群體將會受益最多(或損失最多)。
And following last week's 8.8% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.
在上週股價下跌8.8%之後,私人公司承受了大部分的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Guangdong Deerma Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入挖掘廣東德爾瑪科技的每種所有人形式,從下面的圖表開始。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-2d1fc3c4f331e740bb1e27fde9e85d9d-0-e95196010245974b1e8f34d06f2f3d74.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Deerma Technology?
機構投資者對廣東德爾瑪科技的持股分佈,將有助於我們了解股權最多的機構和基金類型。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Guangdong Deerma Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Guangdong Deerma Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
廣東德爾瑪科技已經有機構在股份登記簿上了。而且,他們在公司裏擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師們已經看了這個股票,他們喜歡它。但是,就像其他任何人一樣,他們有可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,你就可能看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看廣東德爾瑪科技的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-2d1fc3c4f331e740bb1e27fde9e85d9d-1-8dd594e20ae6a0fc80911c48bd227686.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangdong Deerma Technology. Our data shows that Foshan Feiyu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 19% and 6.9% of the stock. Yanqiang Cai, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對廣東德爾瑪科技(Deerma Technology)的股東進行分析,風險資金並沒有持有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,佛山飛魚電器科技股份有限公司是該公司的最大股東,持有該公司30%的流通股。與之相比,第二、第三大股東分別持有該公司的約19%和6.9%的股份。而佔據第三大股東的蔡燕強也同時擔任董事會成員職位。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Deerma Technology
廣東德爾瑪科技的內部股東情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Guangdong Deerma Technology Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥283m worth of the CN¥4.1b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部股東持有廣州德爾瑪科技有限公司的一些股份。就個人而言,內部股東共持有該49億美元公司價值2.83億人民幣的股份。有人會說,這顯示出股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但值得注意的是這是否意味着內部股東一直在售出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Guangdong Deerma Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,通常是散戶投資者,持有廣東德爾瑪科技27%的股份。雖然這種持股比例可能不足以在決策方面影響公司偏好,但仍可以對公司政策施加集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Guangdong Deerma Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司持有廣東德爾瑪科技19%的股份。這意味着他們可以在關鍵政策決策方面發揮影響力。有些人喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時是激進分子,挑戰管理層的責任。但有時,私募股權是退出,使公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 42%, of the Guangdong Deerma Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司擁有廣東德爾瑪科技股票的42%。僅僅從這個事實本身很難得出任何結論,所以我們需要調查是誰在這些私人公司裏擁有股份。有時候,內部人員或其他相關方通過另一傢俬人公司擁有一家上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guangdong Deerma Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Guangdong Deerma Technology has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
了解一家公司的股權分佈是值得探討的,但要更好地了解廣東德爾瑪科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如要了解風險——廣東德爾瑪科技有四大警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。