Individual Investors Are Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & Technology Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600661) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥398m Last Week
Individual Investors Are Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & Technology Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600661) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥398m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 個人投資者對上海新南洋唯教育科技有限公司的重要控制意味着一般公衆有更大的權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
- 前12大股東擁有公司的52%的股權。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600661) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
對上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司(SHSE:600661)股東的分析可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到個人投資者擁有公司48%的股權。換句話說,該集團將從其投資中獲得最多(或最少)的利益。
As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.
因此,個人投資者成爲上週15%收益的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的什麼。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-4d7de581c835aaa28b9c23c4d70d4cbf-0-89be53047d9e7ee7120b14ed3a01e53d.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd?
機構投資者擁有上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的相當數量股權。這可能表明該公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認證。他們也有時會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,則可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司以下的歷史收益。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您可以看到,機構投資者在上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司中擁有相當數量的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認證。他們也有時會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,則可能會看到股價迅速反彈。因此,之後我們將關注上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的財務狀況,下面是該公司的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-4d7de581c835aaa28b9c23c4d70d4cbf-1-50cbbbca8dfd38fdd2373bad828690d4.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is China Capital Investment (Group) Company Ltd. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Changjia Hongtai Investment Center (Limited Partnership) and Shanghai Changjia Investment Co., Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%.
我們注意到,對於上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。看着我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是擁有8.9%已發行股份的中信資本投資(集團)有限公司。第二和第三大股東分別是寧波梅山保稅港區長嘉宏泰投資中心(有限合夥)和上海長嘉投資有限公司,他們擁有相同數量的股份,佔公司股份的7.5%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的所有權數據可以發現,前12大股東持有公司52%的股權,這意味着沒有單個股東佔多數。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd
上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & Technology Co.,Ltd in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It appears that the board holds about CN¥241k worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of CN¥3.1b. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們的數據,我們發現內部人員以自己的名義擁有上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司不到1%的股權。但是,內部人員可能會通過更復雜的結構間接擁有利益。理事會持有大約人民幣24.1萬元的股票。這與市值人民幣31億元相比。較小公司的許多投資者都希望看到理事會擁有更大的投資。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是個人投資者的一般公衆持有上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的48%的股權。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決策偏向對他們的有利,但他們仍可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 5.9%, private equity firms could influence the Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有5.9%的股份的股權投資公司可以影響上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的董事會。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠鼓勵有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。另外,這些持有者可能在上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私人公司擁有37%的上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司股權。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中擁有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Xinnanyang Only Education & TechnologyLtd you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體值得關注,但還有更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每個公司都有其風險,我們已經發現上海新南洋唯教育科技股份有限公司的1個警告信號,您應該知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。