share_log

Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300085) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300085) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

銀之傑(股票代碼:300085)上週下跌8.8%,這一定讓零售投資者失望,他們持有重要股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 01:20

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies is 44%
  • 深圳銀之傑科技業務中零售投資者所持有的大量股權表明,他們在公司管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權。
  • 總共有25個投資者擁有公司的多數股份,佔有50%的所有權
  • 銀之傑科技業務股權中,內部股東持股比例爲44%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300085), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了感受深圳銀之傑科技誰真正掌控公司的局面,了解公司的所有權架構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的集團,確切地說是零售投資者,持有公司約50%的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該集團最爲受益(如果下降,則最爲虧損)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 8.8% price drop, insiders with their 44% also suffered.

上週股價下跌8.8%後,零售投資者的持股受到打擊,與其持有的44%相比,內部股東也遭受了損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解深圳銀之傑科技的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300085 Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
SZSE:300085 2024年6月26日所有權拆分。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies?

深圳銀之傑科技的機構持股比例低於5%。這表明,一些基金關注着深圳銀之傑科技,但許多基金尚未購買該股票。如果該業務從此變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構有意購買股票。有時候當幾家大型機構同時想購買某個特定股票時,我們會看到股價上漲。您可以在下面查看收入和營業收入的歷史記錄,在考慮更多機構投資者是否會想要購買該股票時,這可能會有所幫助。當然,還有很多其他要考慮的因素。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Less than 5% of Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

深圳銀之傑科技的股權和營業收入增長。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300085 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
我們注意到,對深圳銀之傑科技沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,張學軍持有公司15%的流通股份,是最大的股東。葉合和陳祥軍分別持有流通股份的13%和7.0%,是第二大和第三大股東。第三大股東陳祥軍還是董事會主席。此外,CEO李軍擁有公司6.5%的股份。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies. Our data shows that Xuejun Zhang is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 7.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ye He and Xiangjun Chen are the second and third largest shareholders. Xiangjun Chen, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. Furthermore, CEO Jun Li is the owner of 6.5% of the company's shares.

我們的信息表明,內部股東持股佔深圳銀之傑科技的重要份額。內部股東在這家總市值約56億元的公司中持有25億元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍持有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在購買或出售。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies

深圳銀之傑科技的內部股東持股情況。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.5b stake in this CN¥5.6b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

銀之傑科技的普通公衆,包括零售投資者,持有50%的股份。該股份水平賦予了更廣泛的公衆一些影響關鍵政策決策的力量,例如董事會組成,高管薪酬和股息支付比例。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 50% of Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

我覺得了解一家公司的確切所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了獲得真正的見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,不斷存在的投資風險威脅。我們已經確定了銀之傑科技的一個警示信號,了解這些信號應該成爲您的投資過程的一部分。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Shenzhen InfoGem Technologies , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

無責任轉載,用於學習和交流。此外,本網站不保證信息的準確性和完整性。任何行動均由自己承擔,並不與本網站有任何關係。任何利用和轉載本網站信息的情況都必須徵得授權。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論