share_log

Recent 7.5% Pullback Would Hurt Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135) Insiders

Recent 7.5% Pullback Would Hurt Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135) Insiders

最近7.5%的回落將傷害中中科技集團(天津)股份有限公司(SHSE:603135)內部人士。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 02:07

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 2 shareholders own 60% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 艾衛公司對中中科技(天津)的重要控制意味着對公司的增長有既得利益。
  • 前2大股東擁有公司的60%。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

Every investor in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 67% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

中衆科技(天津)股份有限公司(SHSE:603135)的每位投資者都應該了解到最強大的股東團體。而持有最大股份的團體是個人內部人員,擁有67%的所有權。換句話說,該團體從對該公司的投資中獲得(或損失)最多。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 7.5%.

上週內部人損失最大,因爲該股下跌了7.5%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin).

下面的圖表中,我們着眼於中中科技(天津)的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603135 Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
SHSE:603135所有權結構在2024年6月26日的份額內。

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin)?

缺乏機構股東,對於中中科技(天津)有什麼啓示?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin), for yourself, below.

公司沒有機構持股可能有各種各樣的原因。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多注意,因爲大型基金經理不可能在該公司建立有意義的持股。也可能是由於基金經理們不持有該股票,因爲他們對其表現不信任。機構投資者可能認爲該業務的歷史增長並不令人印象深刻,或者可能存在其他因素。您可以在以下看到中中科技(天津)的過去營業收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603135 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
SHSE:603135營收增長在2024年6月26 日。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin). The company's largest shareholder is Bingbing Ma, with ownership of 48%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Hongxin Wang directly holds 2.4% of the total shares outstanding.

中中科技(天津)的股票不是對沖基金家族的首要選擇。該公司最大的股東是馬兵冰,持股率爲48%。其次,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.6%的流通股。此外,公司CEO王宏鑫直接持有公司總流通股的2.4%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,前兩名股東的持股量通過其60%的股份在公司中佔比較大。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin)

中中科技(天津)的內部人持股狀況。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥5.6b, that means they have CN¥3.8b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人擁有中中科技(天津)股份的超過一半。這使他們有效地控制了公司。考慮到其市值爲56億人民幣,這意味着他們擁有價值38億元的股份。很高興看到這種投資水平。在這裏查看這些內部人最近是否有購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者持有中中科技(天津)的20%股份。雖然這種持股量可能不足以影響他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 13%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司13%的股份。深入了解這一點可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人,擁有其中一傢俬人公司的利益,那就應在年報中披露。私人公司對該公司可能也有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管仔細考慮擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了一項對於中衆科技(天津)的警告信號,您在這裏進行投資之前應該了解。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論