share_log

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Industrial Development Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600748) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥516m Market Cap Decline

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Industrial Development Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600748) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥516m Market Cap Decline

上實發展(SHSE:600748)的市值上週下跌了5.16億元人民幣,私營企業是最受影響的。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 03:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私人公司對上實發展有很大的控制權,這意味着普通公衆擁有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關的決策。
  • 前2大股東擁有該公司的55%股份。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Industrial Development Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600748) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

從上實發展股份公司(SHSE:600748)的股東來看,私人公司持有57%的股權,是最強勢的一群。換句話說,該群體在公司的投資中將獲得最大的收益(或可能損失最大)。

As market cap fell to CN¥4.6b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着市值上週降到46億人民幣,民營企業將比公司的任何其他股東群體面臨最高的虧損。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd.

下表展示了上實發展所有股權組的細節。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600748 Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
SHSE:600748所有權分析 2024年6月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd?

機構持股對上實發展有何指示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到上實發展存在機構投資者,他們持有公司的相當部分股票。這表明公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。但是僅僅依靠機構投資者的所謂認證是值得警惕的。他們也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,股價下跌不是不可能。因此,值得注意的是,要檢查上實發展的過去收益軌跡(如下圖)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600748 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
SHSE:600748營收增長情況 2024年6月26日

Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Shanghai Industrial Investment (Holding) Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 49% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

上實發展不是由對沖基金持有。目前,上海實業(控股)有限公司是最大的股東,持有49%的流通股份。作爲參考,第二大股東持有約6.1%的流通股份,第三大股東持有3.6%的流通股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd

上實發展的內部股權情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們注意到我們的數據不顯示任何董事會成員持有股份。考慮到我們沒有掌握內部持股情況,我們可能有缺失的數據。因此,有趣的是評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常情況下,個體投資者(即普通公衆)持有上實發展33%的股份。雖然這樣的佔有比例可能不足以影響政策決策偏向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 57%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到私人企業持有已發行股份的57%。私人企業可能是關聯方。有時內部人士通過持有私人公司中的股權來對公開公司產生利益,而不是以個人的身份擁有。雖然很難得出任何泛泛的結論,但值得注意的是作爲進一步研究的一個領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Shanghai Industrial DevelopmentLtd you should know about.

雖然考慮到不同的股東群體具有一定的價值,但還有更重要的因素需要考慮,比如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已發現上實發展存在3個警示風險,您應該了解。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論