Individual Investors Among Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002250) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.1% Price Drop
Individual Investors Among Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002250) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.1% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 30% of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd
- 聯化科技有限公司個人投資者持有的大量股份表明,他們共同在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的話語權。
- 前25名股東持有46%的股份。
- 內部人員持有聯化科技有限公司30%的股份。
Every investor in Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002250) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 53% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
SZSE:002250公司的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。個人投資者持有公司的最大股份,佔有53%的股份。這意味着,如果股價上漲,則該群體將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下行風險,則將失去最多的利益)。
Following a 8.1% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 30% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌8.1%,個人投資者遭受最大的損失,但持有30%股份的內部人員也受到了打擊。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究聯化科技有限公司的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd?
機構投資者持有聯化科技有限公司相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有某隻股票時,總會存在一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速售出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看聯化科技有限公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在聯化科技業務中持有相當大的股份,這表明他們在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但是,我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,就會存在“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有成長曆史記錄的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看聯化科技歷史收益和收入,但請記住,事情總是不止如此。
Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Jinxiang Mou, with ownership of 25%. AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.0% of common stock, and Youzhi Zhang holds about 2.4% of the company stock.
Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd不是對沖基金的所持有。該公司最大的股東是Jinxiang Mou,持有25%的股權。AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd.是持有4.0%普通股的第二大股東,Youzhi Zhang持有公司股票的約2.4%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。
Insider Ownership Of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd
聯化科技有限公司內部人員持有合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲44億元人民幣,公司內部人員持有13億元人民幣的股份,非常有價值。值得關注的是,它可能值得檢查那些內部人員最近有沒有進行購買。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.4b, and insiders have CN¥1.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
從普通公衆持有的大量股份來看,聯化科技有限公司是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權規模賦予了普通公衆投資者一定的集體權力,他們可能會影響公司執行薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
通常是個人投資者的廣大公衆持有聯化科技Ltd.的高達53%的股份,這說明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權的規模爲公衆投資者提供了一些集體的力量。他們可以並且可能會對高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議中的業務收購等決策產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮持有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了一項聯化科技Ltd.的警告信號,您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com