share_log

Is The Market Rewarding Latham Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWIM) With A Negative Sentiment As A Result Of Its Mixed Fundamentals?

Is The Market Rewarding Latham Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWIM) With A Negative Sentiment As A Result Of Its Mixed Fundamentals?

納斯達克股市是否將Latham Group,Inc.(SWIM)的基本面不佳懲罰爲負面情緒?
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 10:09

With its stock down 23% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard Latham Group (NASDAQ:SWIM). We, however decided to study the company's financials to determine if they have got anything to do with the price decline. Long-term fundamentals are usually what drive market outcomes, so it's worth paying close attention. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Latham Group's ROE today.

隨着過去三個月內股價下跌23%,很容易忽視Latham Group(納斯達克:SWIM)。不過,我們決定研究公司的財務狀況,以確定其是否與價格下跌有關。長期基本面通常是驅動市場結果的因素,因此值得密切關注。特別地,我們今天將關注Latham Group的ROE。

ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.

roe指股東權益回報率,是一種有用的工具,用於評估公司如何有效地從股東獲得的投資中產生回報。簡單來說,這衡量了一家公司相對於股東權益的盈利能力。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股東權益報酬率?

The formula for return on equity is:

權益回報率的計算公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Latham Group is:

那麼,根據上述公式,Latham Group的roe爲:

1.1% = US$4.1m ÷ US$392m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

1.1% = US$4.1m ÷ US$392m(基於過去12個月截至2024年3月)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.01 in profit.

“回報”是過去十二個月稅後收益。這意味着,公司每1美元的股東權益中,產生了0.01美元的利潤。

Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth?

ROE對於盈利增長的重要性是什麼?

Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.

到目前爲止,我們已經了解了ROE衡量公司利潤產生效率的方式。現在我們需要評估公司重新投資或“保留”的利潤是多少,這會讓我們對公司的增長潛力有一個想法。假設其他一切保持不變,ROE和利潤保留率越高,公司的增長率就越高,相比於不一定具備這些特徵的公司。

A Side By Side comparison of Latham Group's Earnings Growth And 1.1% ROE

Latham Group盈利增長和1.1%ROE的並列比較

It is quite clear that Latham Group's ROE is rather low. Not just that, even compared to the industry average of 15%, the company's ROE is entirely unremarkable. For this reason, Latham Group's five year net income decline of 6.4% is not surprising given its lower ROE. However, there could also be other factors causing the earnings to decline. For instance, the company has a very high payout ratio, or is faced with competitive pressures.

很明顯,Latham Group的ROE相當低。不僅如此,即使與行業平均水平15%進行比較,公司的ROE也完全平庸。因此,考慮到其較低的ROE,Latham Group過去五年的淨收入下降6.4%並不令人意外。但是,可能還存在其他導致收益下降的因素。例如,公司的派息比率非常高,或者面臨競爭壓力。

That being said, we compared Latham Group's performance with the industry and were concerned when we found that while the company has shrunk its earnings, the industry has grown its earnings at a rate of 15% in the same 5-year period.

話雖如此,我們將Latham Group的業績與行業進行比較時發現,雖然公司的收益有所縮水,但行業在同樣的五年期間內的收益增長了15%,這讓人擔憂。

past-earnings-growth
NasdaqGS:SWIM Past Earnings Growth June 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:SWIM過去的盈利增長(截至2024年6月26日)

Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. If you're wondering about Latham Group's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry.

盈利增長是估值時需要考慮的一項重要指標。投資者應該試圖確定預期的盈利增長或下降是否已經定價。通過這樣做,他們將有一個想法,無論是朝着清晰的藍色海域前進還是等待泥沼般的水域。如果您想知道Latham Group的估值,請查看其相對於行業的市盈率指數。

Is Latham Group Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?

Latham Group是否有效利用其留存收益?

Because Latham Group doesn't pay any regular dividends, we infer that it is retaining all of its profits, which is rather perplexing when you consider the fact that there is no earnings growth to show for it. So there might be other factors at play here which could potentially be hampering growth. For example, the business has faced some headwinds.

由於Latham Group沒有支付任何常規股息,我們推斷它正在保留其所有利潤,但考慮到沒有盈利增長可顯示,這是相當令人困惑的。因此,這裏可能存在其他因素,這些因素可能會影響增長。例如,業務一直受到一些阻力。

Conclusion

結論

On the whole, we feel that the performance shown by Latham Group can be open to many interpretations. Even though it appears to be retaining most of its profits, given the low ROE, investors may not be benefitting from all that reinvestment after all. The low earnings growth suggests our theory correct. Moreover, after studying current analyst estimates, we discovered that the company's earnings are expected to continue to shrink in the future. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

總的來說,我們認爲Latham Group表現出的業績可以有多種解釋。儘管看起來它保留了大部分利潤,但鑑於低ROE,投資者可能並沒有從所有的再投資中受益。低收益增長證實了我們的理論。此外,在研究當前分析師的預測後,我們發現該公司的收益預計將在未來繼續下降。要了解有關該公司最新分析師預測的更多信息,請查看此公司分析師預測的可視化。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論