Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Solventum Corporation's (NYSE:SOLV) Market Cap Dropped by US$358m
Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Solventum Corporation's (NYSE:SOLV) Market Cap Dropped by US$358m
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Solventum indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 41% of the company
- 22% of Solventum is held by Institutions
- Solventum的零售投資者佔有權重大,說明他們在管理和業務策略方面具有更大的發言權。
- 前25名股東擁有公司股份的41%。
- 22%的Solventum所有權歸機構持有。
If you want to know who really controls Solventum Corporation (NYSE:SOLV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制Solventum Corporation (NYSE:SOLV), 你需要查看其股權登記冊的構成。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,佔有58%的所有權。這意味着,如果股票上漲(或出現下滑),該集團將獲得最大的收益(或承擔最大的損失)。
While institutions who own 22% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$8.9b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
雖然上週市值下降至89億美元之後,擁有22%的機構受到了壓力,但零售投資者承受了最大的虧損。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Solventum.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Solventum不同所有權組的情況。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-1cb89ad79a613053b828de63002ba752-0-0e93d25dabfc4eb19fb7bc8ae14a3de1.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Solventum?
機構投資者對Solventum的持股情況告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Solventum. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Solventum's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Solventum中持有相當多的股份。這可能表明,在投資社區中,該公司具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是謹慎地依靠機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會有錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某支股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的Solventum盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-1cb89ad79a613053b828de63002ba752-1-4733549f28b687c360734c8bd863f034.png/big)
Solventum is not owned by hedge funds. 3M Company is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.6% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 2.7% of the company stock.
Solventum不是由對沖基金持有。目前,3M公司是該公司的最大股東,持有20%的流通股。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,擁有9.6%的普通股,BlackRock,Inc.持有大約2.7%的公司股票.
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Solventum
Solventum的內部股權所有情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們注意到我們的數據不顯示任何董事會成員持有股份。考慮到我們沒有掌握內部持股情況,我們可能有缺失的數據。因此,有趣的是評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 58% of Solventum shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
總體而言,由個人投資者組成的廣大公衆擁有Solventum股份的58%。這種規模的所有權爲廣大投資者提供了一些集體力量。他們可能會影響公司在高管薪酬、股利政策和擬議的業務收購方面的決策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 20% of the Solventum shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有Solventum發行的股份的20%。這可能是出於戰略利益,兩家公司可能存在相關的商業興趣。也有可能是他們進行了分拆。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Solventum better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Solventum (at least 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
思考擁有一家公司股份的不同投資人群體總是有價值的。但是,要更好地了解Solventum,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險這個經常存在的幽靈。我們已經確定了Solventum的2個警示(至少有1個使我們不太滿意),了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。