share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Transwarp Technology (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688031) Recent 7.9% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Transwarp Technology (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688031) Recent 7.9% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

機構投資者可能會採取極端措施,因爲Transwarp Technology (上海)有限公司(SHSE:688031)最近下跌了7.9%,增加了一年的虧損。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 20:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders own 16% of Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd
  • 機構持有Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司的實質性股份意味着他們對該公司股票價格具有重大影響力。
  • 10個投資者擁有該公司51%的股權。
  • 內部人佔有Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司16%的股份。

Every investor in Transwarp Technology (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688031) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司 (SHSE:688031) 的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司36%的所有權。換句話說,該群體從他們對公司的投資中獲得的利益最大(或損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 7.9% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 70% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd which might hurt individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到他們的股份市值下降了7.9%。這些投資者可能會特別關注當前的損失,因爲這增加了股東一年內70%的虧損。通常被稱爲“市場推手”的機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面具有重要影響力。因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能面臨出售Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司的壓力,這可能會損害個人投資者的利益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688031 Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
SHSE:688031所有權分佈2024年6月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好警惕依賴所謂的機構投資者帶來的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們在一個“擁擠的交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會爭相迅速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688031 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
SHSE:688031營收和收入增長2024年6月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Yuanhao Sun with 9.2% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

對於Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司,對沖基金持有的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是首席執行官孫元浩,持有9.2%的股票。作爲背景,次大股東持有約8.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.2%的流通股。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,該公司的股份超過一半由前十大股東持有,表明較大股東的利益在某種程度上被較小股東平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd

Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司內部人佔有相當比例的股份。內部人在這個市值44億元的公司內部擁有6.77億元的股票。我們認爲這表明他們與股東的利益是相一致的,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小。一些內部人可能創立了該業務。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否已經買入或賣出。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Transwarp Technology (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥677m worth of shares in the CN¥4.4b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

通常,普通公衆,即個人投資者,持有Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司20%的股份。雖然這種所有權大小可能不足以影響他們有利於制定的政策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

私募股權公司持有Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司5.6%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策方面具有影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長揸,但總的來說,他們的投資視野較短,不太投資於公共公司。過一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並重新部署資本。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 5.6% stake in Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司的22%的股份。更深入地了解這一點可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人,在其中一個私有公司中擁有利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 22%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我發現看一家公司確切的所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司的2個警告信號,您應該了解。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)Ltd that you should be aware of.

我發現看一個公司的真正擁有者非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了Transwarp Technology (Shanghai)有限公司存在2個警告信號,您需要注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論