Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Touches CN¥8.6b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Touches CN¥8.6b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd存在重要的內部控制,意味着公司增長有着既定利益。
- 總共有5位投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
Every investor in Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
所有史丹利農業集團股份有限公司(SZSE:002588)的投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。 我們可以看到個人內部人員擁有公司的60%所有權。 換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥382m last week.
很明顯,在公司市值上週上漲了3.82億元人民幣後,內部人員獲益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關史丹利農業集團有限公司的什麼信息。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-7011376d34da7e28b735bc8b52e3b0e1-0-cdfc9d94ba9d4e6837c9a935b11aac5d.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd?
機構持股對史丹利農業集團股份有限公司有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd有相當多的機構投資者持股。這可能意味着這家公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好對於依賴機構投資者所謂的認可保持警惕。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構持有一支股票時,存在着這樣的風險,即它們可能處於一個“擁擠的交易”中,當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,此風險更高。你可以看到Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd的歷史收益和營業收入,但也要記住故事遠不止這些。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-7011376d34da7e28b735bc8b52e3b0e1-1-00d1e039f65dec9d26bd0fd9e0002203.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. Our data shows that Wen Ban Gao is the largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Jin Hua Gao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對史丹利農業集團股份有限公司,對沖基金的持股不多。 我們的數據顯示,溫班高是持有的股份中最大的股東,佔有23%。 同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有15%和4.6%的流通股。 也就是說第二大股東,即高金花,也是首席執行官。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd
史丹利農業集團股份有限公司內部人員持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥8.6b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥5.1b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有史丹利農業集團股份有限公司的大部分股份。 這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。 鑑於它的市值爲人民幣86億元,這意味着內部人員擁有高達51億元的股份。 大多數人會認爲這是一種積極的現象,顯示了與股東的強烈一致性。 您可以單擊此處以查看他們是否一直在削減股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
在史丹利農業集團股份有限公司中,普通公衆佔有31%的股份,大多數是個人投資者。 儘管擁有這麼多的所有權可能不足以在其利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。 其中典型案例:我們已經發現史丹利農業集團股份有限公司的2個警告信號,您應該注意其中1個。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com