Individual Investors Account for 50% of United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688469) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 16%
Individual Investors Account for 50% of United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688469) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 16%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over United Nova TechnologyLtd by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- 11% of United Nova TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
- 個人投資者對United Nova TechnologyLtd的重大控制意味着普通公衆擁有更多影響公司管理和治理相關決策的權力。
- 前15名股東持有該公司50%的業務。
- 機構持有United Nova TechnologyLtd 的股份佔比11%。
Every investor in United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688469) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.(SHSE:688469)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體,並擁有50%的所有權的個人投資者的利益最大。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Private equity firms, on the other hand, account for 16% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,私募股權公司持有該公司16%的股份。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of United Nova TechnologyLtd.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了United Nova TechnologyLtd不同股權組的比例。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-4077cd9ecca2a87e953aec51a52b26d5-0-d03e2223e607c94be20f0a0fd808ac70.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About United Nova TechnologyLtd?
機構投資者對United Nova TechnologyLtd傳達了什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in United Nova TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see United Nova TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在United Nova TechnologyLtd中持有相當大的股份。這表明公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構持有股票時,總會有一個風險,即他們投資於一個已成衆人矚目的股票。當這樣的交易走錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於一個沒有增長記錄的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到United Nova TechnologyLtd的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住,故事背後總有更多的東西。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-4077cd9ecca2a87e953aec51a52b26d5-1-68dbe8e5e3296399cfc4e772c193ccae.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in United Nova TechnologyLtd. Zhongxin Technology Private Equity Fund Management (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Shanghai Xingcheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.
對於United Nova TechnologyLtd,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股份。中芯國際目前是該公司最大的股東,持有16%的流通股,其次是持有14%普通股的上海興城投資管理有限公司,以及持有約4.0%公司股票的某些私募股權公司。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東名冊上可以看出,50%的所有權由前15名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數的所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of United Nova TechnologyLtd
United Nova TechnologyLtd的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 50% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
其他基金類型沒有擁有招商南油的實質性投資。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
作爲持有16%股份的私募股權公司,私募股權公司處於塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略的位置。有些投資者可能對此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的戰略。或者這些股東可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 8.4%, of the United Nova TechnologyLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起來,私人公司擁有United Nova TechnologyLtd的8.4%股份。私人公司可能屬於相關方。有時內部人員通過在私營公司中持股而非以個人身份擁有對公共公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是作爲進一步研究領域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 14% of United Nova TechnologyLtd stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
公共公司目前擁有United Nova TechnologyLtd的14%股份。很難說得準,但這表明它們擁有交織的業務利益。這可能是一項戰略股份,因此值得關注此領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for United Nova TechnologyLtd that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮所有佔有公司份額的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了United Nova TechnologyLtd的2個警告信號,您在投資此處之前應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com