share_log

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去的一年中,Amplitude,Inc.(納斯達克:AMPL)已經損失了22%,機構股東對最近的收益感到寬慰
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 06:22

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Amplitude implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders own 15% of Amplitude
  • 機構在振幅公司的實質性持股意味着它們對該公司的股價有重要影響。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 內部持有振幅公司15%的股份。

If you want to know who really controls Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 49% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解誰真正控制了Amplitude,Inc. (納斯達克: AMPL),那麼您必須看看其股權登記表的構成。持有最大比例的是佔公司股份49%的機構。換言之,該組織有可能從其對該公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或損失最多)。

After a year of 22% losses, last week's 5.2% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

經歷了22%的虧損一整年後,上週的5.2%的漲幅可能是機構投資者歡迎的一種跡象,表明回報可能開始上升。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Amplitude, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討振幅的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AMPL Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
NasdaqCM:AMPL股權結構於2024年6月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amplitude?

機構持股告訴我們關於振幅的一些信息。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Amplitude does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amplitude's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,振幅確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在它們處於“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出問題時,多個方面可能會爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在一家沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到振幅的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是有更多的內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AMPL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
NasdaqCM:AMPL盈利和營收增長於2024年6月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Amplitude. Sequoia Capital Operations LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.4% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Battery Ventures and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.3%. In addition, we found that Spenser Skates, the CEO has 5.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

對於振幅,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股票。Sequoia Capital Operations LLC目前是該公司的最大股東,持有已發行股份的8.4%。第二和第三大股東是Battery Ventures和T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,他們各自持有7.3%的股份。此外,我們發現CEO Spenser Skates持有分配給他們的5.2%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Amplitude

振幅的內部持有人

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Amplitude, Inc.. Insiders own US$155m worth of shares in the US$1.0b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人擁有振幅公司的合理比例。內部人在這家總市值爲10億美元的公司中擁有價值1.55億美元的股份。這相當有意義。很高興看到這種投資水平。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

作爲16%的股權,私人股權公司在以創造價值爲重點的企業戰略制定方面扮演着重要角色。有些人會喜歡這種情況,因爲私人股權公司有時候是激進派,使管理層責任制水平更高。但還有些時候,私募股權公司則是在將公司上市後就賣掉。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Amplitude , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我認爲了解一家公司的真正業主非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的持續存在。我們已經識別出振幅公司的2個警示信號,理解它們應該是您的投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論