share_log

With 80% Ownership, Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 80% Ownership, Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有80%所有權的漢考克惠特尼公司(NASDAQ:HWC)擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 08:59

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Hancock Whitney implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構持有漢考克惠特尼的大量股份意味着他們對公司股價具有重要影響力。
  • 共有12家投資者擁有51%的控股權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了更好地了解控制漢考克惠特尼公司(納斯達克代碼:HWC)的人員,了解公司的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構持有公司80%的股份,是該公司的主要股東。換句話說,該集團從公司的投資中獲得最多利益(或者損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hancock Whitney, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解漢考克惠特尼的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HWC Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
納斯達克GS:HWC所有權分佈2024年6月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hancock Whitney?

機構持股對漢考克惠特尼有什麼影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Hancock Whitney already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hancock Whitney's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

漢考克惠特尼已經有機構投資者持有股票。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看漢考克惠特尼以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HWC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
納斯達克GS:HWC收益和營業收入成長2024年6月27日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hancock Whitney. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. With 11% and 5.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。我們注意到,對漢考克惠特尼沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。公司最大股東是貝萊德,擁有14%的股份。其次是第二大和第三大股東,分別是輝瑞公司和文理多維度基金公司,持有公司發行的11%和5.6%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Hancock Whitney

漢考克惠特尼內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hancock Whitney Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$34m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人擁有漢考克惠特尼公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,而內部人擁有價值3400萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。可以點擊此處查看內部人是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。儘管這樣的持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策不與其他大股東一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論