share_log

Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688308) After 11% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688308) After 11% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

歐科億精密切削工具股份有限公司(SHSE:688308)投資者經歷了痛苦的一週,股價下跌11%,機構也遭受了損失。
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 21:43

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over OKE Precision Cutting Tools by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insiders own 25% of OKE Precision Cutting Tools
  • 普通投資人對歐科億的重要控制表明公衆具有更大的影響力,可以影響管理和治理相關的決策。
  • 前7大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
  • 內部人在歐科億持股25%。

Every investor in OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688308) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 27% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位歐科億(SHSE:688308)的投資者都應該了解最重要的股東群體。持有該公司27%股份的是散戶投資者。換句話說,該群體將從其對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)利益。

While institutions who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥3.1b last week,retail investors took the most losses.

儘管上週市值下降至31億元后持股27%的機構承受了壓力,但散戶投資者承擔了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of OKE Precision Cutting Tools.

下圖中詳細介紹了歐科億不同的股權組成。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688308 Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
SHSE:688308股權結構分佈2024年6月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OKE Precision Cutting Tools?

機構投資者在歐科億持有一定比例的股份。這意味着機構分析師已經研究了該股,並對其表示讚賞。但是,就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查歐科億的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要記住考慮其他因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that OKE Precision Cutting Tools does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of OKE Precision Cutting Tools, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SHSE:688308收入和營收增長情況2024年6月28日

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688308 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
我們注意到對於歐科億,對沖基金沒有重大投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是千萬富翁美禾園,持有16%的股份。第二大和第三大股東分別是GEm和Wenqing Tan,分別持有發行股份的10%和9.1%。而第三大股東Wenqing Tan還擔任董事會成員。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in OKE Precision Cutting Tools. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Meihe Yuan with 16% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 9.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, GEM Co., Ltd. and Wenqing Tan are the second and third largest shareholders. Wenqing Tan, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

歐科億內部人持股比例相當大。內部人持有3100百萬元的CN¥77900萬股份。我們可以說這表現出內部人與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小,一些內部人可能是公司創辦人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否已購買或出售。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of OKE Precision Cutting Tools

持有27%股份的普通投資人,主要是個人投資者,擁有一定程度的影響力,可以對歐科億施加一定的影響。這種所有權規模相當大,但可能不足以改變公司政策,如果決策與其他大股東不同步的話。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥779m worth of shares in the CN¥3.1b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

歐科億內部人持有相當比例的股份。內部人在該價值3100百萬元的公司擁有7790萬元人民幣的股份。我們可以說,這表明內部人與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小,一些內部人可能是公司創辦人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否已購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OKE Precision Cutting Tools. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有5.9%的股份的私募股權投資公司在塑造以價值創造爲重心的公司策略方面處於一定地位。有時我們看到私募股權持續長揸,但一般來說,它們具有更短的投資週期,而且不會對公開公司進行太多的投資。一段時間過後,他們可能會考慮出售並重新部署資本。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 5.9%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

我們可以看到,私營公司持有已發行股票的5.2%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人通過持有私營公司的股份而不是以個人的身份持有公共公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 5.2%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,公共公司持有OKE Precision Cutting Tools的已發行股份的10%。這可能是戰略上的利益,兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。可能是他們被拆分了。這個持股是值得進一步調查的。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 10% of the OKE Precision Cutting Tools shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

始終考慮到不同的持股人群體是值得的。但要更好地理解歐科億,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現歐科億有4個警告信號(其中1個不太適合我們!)。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand OKE Precision Cutting Tools better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for OKE Precision Cutting Tools (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

始終考慮到不同的持股人群體是值得的。但要更好地理解歐科億,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現歐科億有4個警告信號(其中1個不太適合我們!),您應該了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論