share_log

While Institutions Invested in Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) Benefited From Last Week's 20% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) Benefited From Last Week's 20% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

當機構投資卡特銀行股份公司(納斯達克:CARE)從上週的20%增長中受益時,零售投資者獲得了最大利益
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 09:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Carter Bankshares' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 41% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 42% of Carter Bankshares is held by Institutions
  • 卡特銀行股份的重要零售投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前25名股東持有41%的業務。
  • 卡特銀行股份的42%由機構持有。

If you want to know who really controls Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制卡特銀行股份公司(NASDAQ:CARE),那麼您必須查看其股權登記簿的組成。零售投資者擁有最大的股份,佔54%。換句話說,該團體最有可能(或最大程度地)從其對該公司的投資中獲利(或蒙受損失)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$304m last week, while institutions who own 42% also benefitted.

當市值上週達到3.04億美元時,零售投資者獲得了最多的收益,而持有42%股份的機構也從中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Carter Bankshares.

讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東對卡特銀行股份公司的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CARE Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
納斯達克市場股份公司(CARE)所有權分解於2024年6月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Carter Bankshares?

機構所有權對卡特銀行股份公司的提示

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Carter Bankshares does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Carter Bankshares' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到卡特銀行股份公司確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好提防依賴所謂的機構投資者所帶來的驗證。他們也會犯錯。當多家機構共同擁有股票時,存在一定的風險,即他們處於“擁擠的交易”中。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看卡特銀行股份公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CARE Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
納斯達克市場股份公司(CARE)的收益和營業收入增長於2024年6月28日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Carter Bankshares. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 7.1% of shares outstanding. With 5.8% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, AllianceBernstein L.P. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

對Carter Bankshares而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。從我們的數據中可以看出,持有股票總數最多的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,其佔公司已發行股票的7.1%。 AllianceBernstein L.P.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分別持有已發行股票的5.8%和5.4%,是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Carter Bankshares

卡特銀行股份公司內部持有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Carter Bankshares, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$12m worth of stock in the US$304m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會有興趣了解公司內部股東持有情況。內部股東以自己的名義持有了價值1200萬美元的美國304萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的一致性。點擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in Carter Bankshares, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

一般公衆通常是個體投資者,持有卡特銀行股份54%的股份,表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權的規模賦予了公衆投資者一些集體權力。他們可以和可能會對執行薪酬、股息政策和建議的業務收購方案等決策產生影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Carter Bankshares .

我發現查看一家公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正了解情況,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該意識到:關於卡特銀行股份公司,我們已經發現了1個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論