share_log

A Closer Look At Light & Wonder, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LNW) Impressive ROE

A Closer Look At Light & Wonder, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LNW) Impressive ROE

納斯達克:光明與奇蹟公司(NASDAQ:LNW) ROE 表現引人注目
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 08:04

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of Light & Wonder, Inc. (NASDAQ:LNW).

儘管有些投資者已經熟悉財務指標,但本文是爲那些想要學習ROE及其重要性的人而寫的。通過實踐學習,我們將查看ROE以更好地了解Light&Wonder,Inc.(納斯達克:LNW)

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

股東必須考慮股本回報率或ROE,因爲它告訴他們公司如何有效地重新投資他們的資本。 簡而言之,ROE顯示每美元股東投資所產生的利潤。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股東權益報酬率?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

股東權益報酬率可以使用以下公式計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Light & Wonder is:

因此,根據上述公式,Light & Wonder的ROE爲:

28% = US$235m ÷ US$835m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

28%= 2.35億美元÷ 8.35億美元(基於截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.28 in profit.

“回報”是企業在過去一年中獲得的收入。另一種思考方式是,對於每1美元的股權,公司能夠賺取0.28美元的利潤。

Does Light & Wonder Have A Good Return On Equity?

Light & Wonder的ROE表現如何?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. Pleasingly, Light & Wonder has a superior ROE than the average (19%) in the Hospitality industry.

通過將公司的roe與其所在行業的平均值進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其整體表現如何。此方法的侷限性在於,即使在同一行業分類內,某些公司也可能與其他公司大不相同。令人高興的是,Light&Wonder在酒店業的ROE表現優於平均水平(19%)。

roe
NasdaqGS:LNW Return on Equity June 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:LNW ROE 2024年6月29日

That is a good sign. Bear in mind, a high ROE doesn't always mean superior financial performance. A higher proportion of debt in a company's capital structure may also result in a high ROE, where the high debt levels could be a huge risk . To know the 2 risks we have identified for Light & Wonder visit our risks dashboard for free.

這是一個好現象。請注意,高ROE並不總是意味着出色的財務表現。公司資本結構中更高比例的債務可能也會導致高ROE,其中高負債水平可能構成巨大風險。要了解我們爲Light&Wonder確定的2種風險,請免費訪問我們的風險儀表板。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

公司通常需要投資來增加利潤,這些資金可以來自保留收益、發行新股(股權)或債務。在前兩種情況下,ROE將捕捉到這種利用資本增長的情況。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將改善回報,但不會影響總股權。因此,債務的使用可以提高ROE,儘管在比喻性地說的風雨來臨的情況下伴隨着額外的風險。

Light & Wonder's Debt And Its 28% ROE

Light & Wonder的債務和其28%的ROE

It appears that Light & Wonder makes extensive use of debt to improve its returns, because it has an alarmingly high debt to equity ratio of 4.64. So although the company has an impressive ROE, the company might not have been able to achieve this without the significant use of debt.

看來Light & Wonder利用債務提高回報,因爲其債務股本比達到驚人的4.64。因此,儘管該公司ROE令人印象深刻,但該公司可能無法在沒有大量使用債務的情況下實現這一點。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

股東權益回報率對比不同企業的質量很有用。沒有太多債務就能取得高股東權益回報率的公司通常質量較好。如果兩家公司的債權與股權大致相同,而一家公司的股東權益回報率較高,則我通常會更喜歡具有較高股東權益回報率的公司。

Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

儘管ROE是企業質量的有用指標,但您還需要考慮一系列因素來確定購買股票的正確價格。重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長以及今後需要多少投資。因此,我認爲值得查看有關該公司分析師預測的免費報告。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您也可能通過尋找其他地方來找到出色的投資。因此,不妨查看這個有趣公司的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論