share_log

While Shareholders of Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) Are in the Red Over the Last Three Years, Underlying Earnings Have Actually Grown

While Shareholders of Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) Are in the Red Over the Last Three Years, Underlying Earnings Have Actually Grown

雖然Enterprise Financial Services(納斯達克股票代碼:EFSC)的股東在過去的三年裏虧損,但基本收益實際上增長了。
Simply Wall St ·  06/30 09:32

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Enterprise Financial Services Corp (NASDAQ:EFSC) shareholders, since the share price is down 12% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 18%. On the other hand the share price has bounced 6.5% over the last week.

許多投資者認爲,在長期內擊敗市場平均水平是成功的投資方法。 但幾乎可以肯定的是,有時您會購買表現低於市場平均水平的股票。 不幸的是,長揸Enterprise Financial Services Corp (NASDAQ:EFSC)股票的股東們就遇到了這種情況,因爲股價在過去三年中下跌了12%,遠遠落後於市場回報約爲18%。 另一方面,股價在過去一週上漲了6.5%。

On a more encouraging note the company has added US$93m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the three-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,公司在過去7天內僅增加了9300萬美元的市值,因此讓我們看看我們是否能夠確定是什麼導致了股東的三年虧損。

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

雖然市場是一個強大的定價機制,但股價反映的不僅僅是企業的基本業績,還有投資者的情緒。一個不完美但簡單的方式來考慮公司市場意識的變化是比較每股收益(EPS)的變化和股價的變化。

Although the share price is down over three years, Enterprise Financial Services actually managed to grow EPS by 13% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

雖然股價在過去三年中下跌,但Enterprise Financial Services的每股收益實際上在此期間每年增長了13%。鑑於股價反應,人們可能會懷疑EPS不能很好地指導業績表現(可能由於一次性損失或盈利)。或者公司在過去被誇大其詞,因此其增長表現讓人失望。

We're actually a quite surprised to see the share price down while EPS have grown strongly. So we'll have to take a look at other metrics to try to understand the price action.

事實上,我們很驚訝地看到EPS大幅增長而股價卻下跌。 因此,我們需要查看其他指標以試圖理解價格行動。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 22% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Enterprise Financial Services more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

我們注意到,在三年內,營業收入實際上以22%的年度增長率增長,因此這似乎不是出售股票的原因。 這種分析只是例行公事,但是更接近地研究Enterprise Financial Services可能是值得的,因爲有時股票會不公平地下跌。 這可能會提供機會。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的圖片中看到收入和營業收入隨時間的變化情況(單擊圖表可查看精確值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:EFSC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 30th 2024
NasdaqGS:EFSC 營業收入和收益增長2024年6月30日

Take a more thorough look at Enterprise Financial Services' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet.

通過本平衡表的免費報告,全面查看Enterprise Financial Services的財務狀況。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Enterprise Financial Services' TSR for the last 3 years was -6.0%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

考慮到任何股票的總股東回報率以及股價回報率都很重要。雖然股價回報僅反映股價的變化,但TSR包括分紅的價值(假定它們被再投資)以及任何折扣資本籌集或分拆的好處。 因此,對於付出豐厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股價回報高得多。 恰好,過去3年Enterprise Financial Services的TSR爲-6.0%,超過了先前提到的股價回報。 這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Enterprise Financial Services shareholders are up 7.3% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately this falls short of the market return. The silver lining is that the gain was actually better than the average annual return of 1.7% per year over five year. It is possible that returns will improve along with the business fundamentals. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Enterprise Financial Services you should be aware of.

今年以來,企業金融服務股東的收益率增長了7.3%(包括分紅派息)。不幸的是,這仍然低於市場回報。不過值得一提的是,這個增長幅度實際上比過去五年平均年回報率1.7%更好。隨着業務基本面的改善,收益可能會有所提高。我認爲,長揸股票作爲企業業績的代理人很有意思。但想要真正深入了解,我們還需要考慮到其他信息。舉個例子:我們已經發現了企業金融服務的一個警告信號,你應該知道。

We will like Enterprise Financial Services better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我們看到一些內部大規模買入股票,我們會更喜歡Enterprise Financial Services。 在等待的同時,可以查看此免費列表,其中列出了近期有重大內部人士購買的被低估股票(主要是小市值股票)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論