share_log

Private Companies in Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688039) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 20% Last Week

Private Companies in Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688039) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 20% Last Week

杭州阿爾卡迪奧科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 688039)的私人企業是其最大的賭徒,他們的賭注在上週股票增長了20%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 02:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 杭州雲瑞視頻科技的重要私人公司所有權表明關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東影響。
  • 前6大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

A look at the shareholders of Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688039) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

了解杭州雲瑞視頻科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688039)的股東情況可以告訴我們哪個團體最強大。持有最大份額的是擁有47%所有權的私人公司。換句話說,該團體可能會從其對公司的投資中獲得或失去最多。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥2.9b market cap following a 20% gain in the stock.

因此,私人公司上週共同得分最高,隨着股票上漲20%,公司市值達到29億元。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology.

接下來,讓我們更仔細地了解不同類型的股東能夠告訴我們有關杭州雲瑞視頻技術的信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688039 Ownership Breakdown July 1st 2024
SHSE:688039所有權分佈2024年7月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們關於杭州雲瑞視頻技術的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在杭州雲瑞視頻技術中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要僅依靠機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某支股票,則經常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查杭州雲瑞視頻技術的歷史收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688039 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
SHSE:688039收益和營業收入增長2024年7月1日

Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Dalian Hongchang Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 11%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

杭州雲瑞視頻技術沒有由對沖基金擁有。大連紅昌企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥企業)是目前該公司最大的股東,持有16%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的12%和11%。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology

杭州雲瑞視頻技術的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.9b, and the board has only CN¥2.5m worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,杭州雲瑞視頻技術股份有限公司內部人持有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們注意到,內部人可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。它的市值只有29億元,董事會名下只有250萬人民幣的股票。許多較小公司的投資者更喜歡看到董事會投資更重。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

大衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司44%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管佔有率相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不能改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 47%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到私人公司擁有發行股份的47%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究是誰擁有這些私人公司。有時,內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我覺得查看一家公司的所有權非常有趣。但是要真正獲得深入的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,杭州安可視科技在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警告信號,您應該知道……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論