A Great Week That Adds to Stellar Bancorp, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 55% Must Be Happy
A Great Week That Adds to Stellar Bancorp, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 55% Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Stellar Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構的持股比例高意味着Stellar Bancorp的股價對他們的交易行爲很敏感。
- 業務的50%由前21名股東持有。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (NYSE:STEL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
爲了了解真正控制Stellar Bancorp,Inc. (紐交所:STEL) 的人是誰,了解業務的所有權結構是十分重要的。我們可以看到機構擁有公司 55% 的股份。換句話說,該集團是最有利/最劣的獲利方,也是/最多的投資方。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$61m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 1.2% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
機構投資者的前景正在好轉,因爲公司上週市值增加了6100萬美元。目前,該投資的一年回報率爲1.2%,上週的增長是更受歡迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Stellar Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Stellar Bancorp的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stellar Bancorp?
機構投資者對Stellar Bancorp告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Stellar Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stellar Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,恒星幣確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者中存在一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一種股票時,總是存在着他們在一起的風險。當這樣一場交易失敗時,多個方面可能爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到Stellar Bancorp的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住這個故事還有更多內容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stellar Bancorp. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Robert Franklin, the CEO has 0.8% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要影響力。我們注意到對沖基金對Stellar Bancorp的投資並不重要。該公司最大的股東是黑石集團,持股比例爲14%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有股份總數的5.9%和3.9%。此外,我們發現執行長Robert Franklin持有指定股份的0.8%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細的所有權情況表明,前21大股東擁有50%的股份,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Stellar Bancorp
恒星幣的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Stellar Bancorp, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$156m stake in this US$1.2b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人員擁有Stellar Bancorp,Inc.的顯著部分股份。看到內部人員在這家12億美元企業中擁有有意義的1.56億美元股份確實很有趣。這種投資水平很好。您可以在此處檢查看這些內幕人員最近是否一直在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Stellar Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有30% 的市值權,這個主要由個人投資者組成的普通公衆對Stellar Bancorp有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定會發號施令,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stellar Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Stellar Bancorp (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮公司中所有股東的不同群體。但如果要更好地理解恒星幣銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了2個警告信號,包括1個有點令人擔憂! 在此投資之前,您應該意識到這些問題。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com