share_log

Retail Investors Invested in Pansoft Company Limited (SZSE:300996) up 14% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded

Retail Investors Invested in Pansoft Company Limited (SZSE:300996) up 14% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded

零售投資者上週投資於 Pansoft 公司有限公司(SZSE:300996)達到14%增長,內部人士也得到了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Pansoft's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 19 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Pansoft is 35%
  • Pansoft的重要零售投資者持股表明,重大決策受到來自更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 19個股東持有企業的51%股份。
  • Pansoft的內部持股比例爲35%。

If you want to know who really controls Pansoft Company Limited (SZSE:300996), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Pansoft Company Limited (SZSE:300996),那麼您需要看其股東登記冊的構成。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有該公司的大部分所有權,佔35%。也就是說,該群體在股票上漲時受益最多(或在經濟衰退時失去最多)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥3.0b last week, while insiders who own 35% also benefitted.

市值上週觸及30億元后,零售投資者獲得了最多的獲利,而持有35%的內部股東也獲得了好處。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pansoft, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始深入研究Pansoft的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300996 Ownership Breakdown July 1st 2024
SZSE:300996所有權拆分圖(2024年7月1日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pansoft?

機構投資者持有Pansoft,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明Pansoft在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。當兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時賣出股票時,股價下跌是很常見的情況。因此,值得檢查Pansoft的過去收益軌跡(如下圖所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Pansoft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Pansoft, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SZSE:300996業績和營收增長(2024年7月1日) 儘管不同的股東群體擁有一家公司是很值得考慮的,但有些因素更加重要。爲此,你應該了解我們發現的兩個警告信號(包括我們不太滿意的一個警告信號)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300996 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
對沖基金持有的Pansoft股票不多。我們的數據顯示,林國強是持有股份達11%的最大股東。王輝和山西電視股權投資有限公司分別持有10%和3.0%的股份,是第二大和第三大股東。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pansoft. Our data shows that Guoqiang Lin is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 3.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hugh Wang and Shanxi Dianshi Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

Pansoft的內部持股比例相當高。它的市值僅爲30億元人民幣,而內部股東擁有價值11億元人民幣的股票。我們認爲這顯示了股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;有些內部人員可能是創辦業務的。您可以單擊此處,查看那些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售股票。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更仔細地看我們的所有權數據表明,前19名股東持有的股份總共佔51%,這意味着沒有單個股東具有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Pansoft

雖然不同投資者持有Pansoft股票的比例是很重要的,但還有其他更加重要的因素。因此,您應該學習我們發現的兩個警告信號(其中一個警告信號並不太令人滿意)。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Pansoft Company Limited. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥3.0b, and insiders have CN¥1.1b worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 35% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆 -- 包括零售投資者 -- 持有該公司的35%股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的優勢中左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Pansoft (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

雖然不同投資者持有Pansoft股票的比例是很重要的,但還有其他更加重要的因素。因此,您應該學習我們發現的兩個警告信號(其中一個警告信號並不太令人滿意)。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論