share_log

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Tapestry(紐交所:TPR)擁有相當健康的資產負債表
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 08:30

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Tapestry, Inc. (NYSE:TPR) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。” 當我們考慮一家公司的風險程度時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務利用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。我們可以看到Tapestry公司(NYSE:TPR)在其業務中確實使用了債務。但是,這個債務對股東來說是否令人擔憂呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

直到企業遇到無法用新資本或自由現金流償還債務的問題時,債務才有助於企業。最終,如果公司無法履行其法定義務償還債務,股東可能什麼都拿不到。但是,更常見的情況是公司必須以極低的價格發行股票,從而永久性稀釋股東的權益,以支撐其資產負債表。但債務可以取代股權稀釋,成爲需要資本以高投資回報率進行增長的企業的極好工具。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Tapestry's Net Debt?

Tapestry的淨負債是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Tapestry had US$7.70b of debt, an increase on US$1.67b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$7.42b, its net debt is less, at about US$280.7m.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但是它顯示截至2024年3月,Tapestry負債總額爲70億美元,比去年增加了16.7億美元。但是,由於其有74.2億美元的現金儲備,因此其淨負債較少,約爲2.807億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:TPR Debt to Equity History July 2nd 2024
NYSE:TPR的資產負債歷史情況(2024年7月2日)

How Strong Is Tapestry's Balance Sheet?

Tapestry的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Tapestry had liabilities of US$1.37b due within a year, and liabilities of US$9.59b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$7.42b in cash and US$499.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.04b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Tapestry在一年內到期的負債總額爲13.7億美元,在此之後到期的負債總額爲95.9億美元。與之相抵消的是,它擁有74.2億美元的現金和4.992億美元的應收款,這些款項在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額超過了其現金和近期應收款的總和304億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Tapestry is worth US$9.83b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

這個赤字並不是很糟糕,因爲Tapestry價值98.3億美元,因此如果需要,它可能可以籌集足夠的資本來支持其資產負債表。然而,仍有必要仔細研究其償還債務的能力。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過查看淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)並計算其利息費用(利息覆蓋)來相對衡量公司的負債水平。這樣,我們考慮債務的絕對規模以及支付的利息費用。

Tapestry's net debt is only 0.20 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 74.2 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, Tapestry grew its EBIT by 9.0% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Tapestry's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Tapestry的淨負債只有其EBITDA的0.20倍。其EBIT覆蓋其利息支出多達74.2倍。因此,你可以說它受債務威脅的程度,就像大象受老鼠威脅的程度那樣微不足道。幸運的是,Tapestry去年的EBIT增長了9.0%,使這個債務負擔看起來更加可控。從資產負債表中可以了解到債務的情況,但未來的盈利才是決定Tapestry能否保持健康資產負債表的關鍵。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看分析師的盈利預測報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Tapestry recorded free cash flow worth 78% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。因此,合乎邏輯的下一步是看看EBIT中實際自由現金流所佔比例。在最近三年中,Tapestry記載的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的78%,這是正常水平,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這種自由現金流使公司有能力在適當時期償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Tapestry's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Zooming out, Tapestry seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Tapestry that you should be aware of.

令人高興的是,Tapestry令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率意味着它在債務方面具有上風。而好消息並不止於此,因爲它將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力也支持這種印象!概括來看,Tapestry似乎相當合理地使用債務;這讓我們認爲它是值得肯定的。畢竟,明智的槓桿比率可以提高股本回報率,而資產負債表顯然是分析債務的重點。但是,每個公司最終都可能存在超出資產負債表以外的風險。例如,我們發現了一個Tapestry的風險警告,您應該注意。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有負債負擔的股票的投資者,則今天就可以發現我們的獨家淨現金增長股清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論