share_log

With 60% Ownership, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 60% Ownership, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

美國銀行公司(NYSE:BAC)擁有60%的股份,享有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 15:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Bank of America implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構對美國銀行持有大量股份意味着他們在該公司股價方面擁有重要影響力。
  • 前25名股東持有49%的業務。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

紐交所:BAC的每一位投資者都應意識到最有力的股東團體。 機構持有該公司的60%股份,這意味着該團體可以從其對公司的投資中獲得(或損失)最多。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Bank of America.

在下表中,我們着眼於美國銀行不同的股權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BAC Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
紐交所:BAC所有權拆分(2024年7月2日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bank of America?

機構持股情況能告訴我們有關美國銀行的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bank of America. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bank of America's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在美國銀行持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者中具有一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像任何人一樣。當多個機構擁有某股票時,總會存在他們可能在“擁擠交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個利益相關方可能會加速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到美國銀行的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事肯定不止這些內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BAC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
紐交所:BAC收益和營業收入增長(2024年7月2日)

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Bank of America is not owned by hedge funds. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者持有該公司50%以上的股份。因此,他們可以共同影響董事會的決策。美國銀行不是由對沖基金持有的。伯克希爾哈撒韋公司是目前該公司最大的股東,擁有13%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.2%和6.2%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Bank of America

美國銀行內部人員的所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Bank of America Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$439m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士在自己的名義下擁有的美國銀行股份不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部人員擁有公司的大比例股份會讓人驚訝。儘管他們的持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值439萬美元的股份(按當前價格)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

看起來私人公司擁有福建啓始集團有限責任公司44%的股權。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份擁有上市公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 13% of the Bank of America shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到上市公司持有銀行股票的13%。雖然很難確定,但這表明它們有着相互關聯的商業利益。這可能是一個戰略性的股份,因此值得關注股權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Bank of America better, we need to consider many other factors.

了解一家公司的股東群體是值得思考的重要部分。但要更好地了解美國銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡檢查營收增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過查看這個詳細的圖表中歷史營收和收益的免費圖表來了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論