Inter & Co, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:INTR) Market Cap Dropped US$101m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Inter & Co, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:INTR) Market Cap Dropped US$101m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Inter & Co by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 4 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Institutions own 26% of Inter & Co
- 個體投資者對Inter & Co的重大控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關的決策
- 前四大股東擁有該公司53%的股份。
- 機構擁有Inter & Co的26%股份
If you want to know who really controls Inter & Co, Inc. (NASDAQ:INTR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 28% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制Inter & Co,Inc.(納斯達克:INTR),那麼你需要看看它的股權登記簿的構成。在該公司中持有最多股份的集團,確切地說是約28%的個人投資者。換句話說,這個集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to US$2.6b last week, individual investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市值上週跌至26億美元,個人投資者將面臨該公司任何其他股東群體中最高的虧損。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Inter & Co.
在以下圖表中,我們放大Inter & Co的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inter & Co?
機構投資者的持股情況告訴我們關於Inter & Co的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Inter & Co. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Inter & Co's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者對Inter & Co擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某個股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Inter & Co下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Inter & Co. Costellis International Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 27% of shares outstanding. With 15% and 7.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, SBLA Advisers Corp. and Squadra Investments – Gestao de Recursos Ltda. are the second and third largest shareholders.
對Inter & Co而言,對沖基金的股份不多。Costellis International Limited目前是最大的股東,持有27%的流通股。持有15%和7.3%的流通股,SBLA Advisers Corp.和Squadra Investments-Gestao de Recursos Ltda.分別是第二和第三大股東。
On looking further, we found that 53% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步查看,我們發現前4大股東持有該公司的53%股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中有一個很重要的發言權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Inter & Co
Inter & Co的內部人士所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Inter & Co, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$99m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到,內部人士擁有Inter & Co,Inc.的股份。內部人士擁有價值9900萬美元的有意義的股份。大多數人會將此視爲真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內部人員的關聯問題,可以單擊此處以查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Inter & Co. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Inter & Co 28%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步的話,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 15%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有15%的股權,私人股權公司具有塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略的地位。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私人股權有時是激進分子,他們會追究管理責任。但其他時候,私人股權正在出售,已使公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司27%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得關注誰擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司擁有公共公司的股權。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Inter & Co that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現查看公司確切所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現Inter & Co有2個警告信號,您在此進行投資之前應該了解這些信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。