Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 35% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 29%
Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 35% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 29%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Hongfa Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutions own 29% of Hongfa Technology
- 創業板宏發股份的散戶控股意味着廣大公衆更有權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
- 前12名股東持有該公司51%的股份。
- 機構佔有宏發股份29%的股權。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解宏發股份股權結構,了解真正掌控它的人,就需要認識業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到散戶擁有公司35%的股權,因此,如果股票上漲,則該群體將獲益最多(如果出現下降,則失去的也最多)。
And institutions on the other hand have a 29% ownership in the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.
機構佔公司29%的股份。機構往往擁有更成熟的公司的股份,而在小公司中看到內部人員擁有相當多的股份並不罕見。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hongfa Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探究宏發股份的每一種業主類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hongfa Technology?
機構持股量說明宏發股份什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hongfa Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hongfa Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在宏發股份擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者們對該公司頗有信譽。但我們不能只依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一支股票,那麼看到股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查宏發股份過去的盈利軌跡(如下圖)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。
Hongfa Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Youge Investment Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 3.4% of the stock.
宏發股份不屬於對沖基金所有。優格投資有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有該公司27%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約5.4%和3.4%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
看一下股東註冊表,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Hongfa Technology
宏發股份的內部人員擁有的股份。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 35% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司35%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然所有權很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司27%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得關注誰擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司擁有公共公司的股權。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Hongfa Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮公司的不同股東群體非常值得,但有其他更重要的因素。請注意,宏發股份在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com