share_log

Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601878) Stock Price Dropped 3.4% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601878) Stock Price Dropped 3.4% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

浙商證券(SHSE:601878)的股價上週下跌了3.4%;私人公司不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 19:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Zheshang Securities' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • Zhejiang Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd owns 55% of the company
  • 10% of Zheshang Securities is held by Institutions
  • 浙商證券重要的私人公司持股表明關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響。
  • 浙江通信投資集團有限公司擁有該公司的55%股份。
  • 所有基金類型持有浙商證券10%股份。

Every investor in Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601878) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

浙商證券股份有限公司(SHSE:601878)的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大股份的是佔有58%所有權的私營企業。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(如果出現衰退則損失最多)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 3.4%.

而上週私人公司承受了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了3.4%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zheshang Securities.

讓我們更仔細地觀察一下不同類型的股東對浙商證券的影響。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601878 Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
SHSE:601878 2024年7月3日的持股比例

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zheshang Securities?

機構投資者持股消息對浙商證券有什麼指示嗎?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Zheshang Securities does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zheshang Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看出,浙商證券確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的一定股份。這表明認可的專業投資人比例相對較高,但是僅憑這一事實是不足以依賴的,因爲機構投資者有時會做出錯誤的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,存在“擁擠交易”的風險。當這類交易失敗時,多個交易方可能會爭相快速出售股票。在一個沒有成長曆史的公司,這種風險會更高。您可以看到浙商證券的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住故事總是更加複雜的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601878 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
SHSE:601878 2024年7月3日的收益和營業收入增長率

Zheshang Securities is not owned by hedge funds. Zhejiang Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 55% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.7% and 1.8% of the stock.

浙商證券不是由對沖基金持有的,浙江通信投資集團有限公司是目前持有最多股份的股東,持股比例爲55%。由於在持有股權方面佔據重要位置,我們可以推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重要控制權。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有該公司2.7%和1.8%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Zheshang Securities

浙商證券的內部股東

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否持有個人股份。董事會成員至少持有一些個人股份是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行動是檢查CEO的薪資。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Zheshang Securities. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常情況下,普通公衆(也就是個人投資者)持有浙商證券的股份達到31%。雖然擁有這麼大的股份很可觀,但是如果與其他大股東的決策不一致,則可能不足以改變公司方針。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 58%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司持有該公司發行的股份中的58%。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司的所有權。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Zheshang Securities you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體很值得,但其他因素更爲重要。例如,風險。每個公司都面臨風險,我們在浙商證券中發現了1個警示信號,需要了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論