share_log

Recent 5.5% Pullback Would Hurt Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) Insiders

Recent 5.5% Pullback Would Hurt Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) Insiders

最近5.5%的回撤會對華榮股份(SHSE:603855)的內部人員造成傷害。
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 19:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Warom Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Institutions own 21% of Warom Technology
  • 內部人似乎對華榮股份的增長懷有濃厚的興趣,這可以從他們持有的較大比例股份看出。
  • 該公司的前五大股東擁有51%的股份。
  • 機構持有華榮股份21%的股份。

A look at the shareholders of Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察華榮股份公司(上海證券交易所:603855)的股東可以知道哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團(確切地說約佔54%)是個人內部人。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 5.5%.

上週,內部人遭受最大損失,因爲股票下跌了5.5%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Warom Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解華榮股份每種所有者類型,並從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603855 Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
SHSE:603855所有權結構2024年7月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Warom Technology?

機構所有權對華榮股份有何啓示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Warom Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Warom Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在華榮股份中持有相當比例的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了該股票並喜歡它。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在他們在“擁擠的交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易出現偏差時,多個各方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的企業中,這種風險更高。您可以查看華榮股份的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603855 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
SHSE:603855盈利和營業收入增長2024年7月3日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Warom Technology. Our data shows that Zhi Rong Hu is the largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Jiang Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

對於華榮股份,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Zhi Rong Hu是持有34%流通股的最大股東。爲了更好地理解,第二大股東持有流通股的約6.5%,緊隨其後的第三大股東擁有流通股的4.3%。同時,第三大股東江麗還擔任董事會成員的職位。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Warom Technology

華榮股份的內部人持有超過一半的股份。這賦予了他們很大的權力。因此,他們在這個70億人民幣的業務中持有38億元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起進行投資。您可能希望免費了解他們是否一直在購買或出售。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Warom Technology Incorporated Company stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a CN¥3.8b stake in this CN¥7.0b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

儘管值得考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已發現華榮股份存在1個警告信號,在投資這裏之前,您應該注意它。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有該公司25%的股份,並因此不能輕視他們。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以扭轉政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Warom Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同集團的意義重大,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已發現華榮科技有一個警告信號,如果您在此處投資,應該注意它。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論