After the Recent Decline, YanKer Shop Food Co.,Ltd (SZSE:002847) CEO Xuewu Zhang's Holdings Have Lost 3.1% of Their Value
After the Recent Decline, YanKer Shop Food Co.,Ltd (SZSE:002847) CEO Xuewu Zhang's Holdings Have Lost 3.1% of Their Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over YanKer shop FoodLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 2 shareholders own 64% of the company
- 18% of YanKer shop FoodLtd is held by Institutions
- 鹽津鋪子食品有限公司控制者的重要地位意味着對公司增長具有既得利益。
- 前2大股東擁有公司的64%。
- 鹽津鋪子食品有限公司18%的股份由機構持有。
Every investor in YanKer shop Food Co.,Ltd (SZSE:002847) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 67% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
持有鹽津鋪子食品股份的每個投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。個人內部持有公司的股份最高,達到67%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥12b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市值上週下跌至12億元,公司股東中內部人員將面臨最高的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about YanKer shop FoodLtd.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對鹽津鋪子食品有限公司的影響。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240704/0-46ff20e4a22d65eeb610e61545c28ccd-0-0e40a4049cd406a3b25b45e1692da5ff.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About YanKer shop FoodLtd?
機構投資者給我們提供了什麼關於鹽津鋪子食品有限公司的信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that YanKer shop FoodLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of YanKer shop FoodLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,鹽津鋪子食品有限公司確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中存在某些信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,看到大股東出售股票可能會導致股價大跌。因此,值得檢查鹽津鋪子食品有限公司過去的收益軌跡(下面)。當然,還要牢記其他因素。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240704/0-46ff20e4a22d65eeb610e61545c28ccd-1-39c6db35e97f3e7d40e69a101fdcc2a9.png/big)
YanKer shop FoodLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Xuewu Zhang with 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 16% and 2.5% of the stock.
鹽津鋪子食品有限公司並未被對沖基金所擁有。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是CEO Xuewu Zhang,持有公司已發行股份的48%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約16%和2.5%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of YanKer shop FoodLtd
鹽津鋪子食品有限公司內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of YanKer shop Food Co.,Ltd. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Insiders own CN¥7.8b worth of shares in the CN¥12b company. That's extraordinary! Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人員擁有鹽津鋪子食品有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以爲公司作出集體決策。內部人員持有價值78億元的股票,佔120億元的公司總股本的比例是非常高的。大多數人認爲這是一個積極的信號,顯示與股東的強烈合作。點擊此處查看內部股東是否一直在減持他們的股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over YanKer shop FoodLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有16%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對鹽津鋪子食品有限公司有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益之中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that YanKer shop FoodLtd is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,我們的投資分析顯示鹽津鋪子食品有限公司存在2個警告信號,您應該了解其中的內容。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。